• AstaKask@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    The UK should do a major spelling reform and troll the shit out of the U.S and their then “archaic” English.

    • KSP Atlas@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      Ðat wúd bē sō sili, hüever it wúd absolútli rúin ŪK-ŪS komūnikāshon

      Sum myt sā ðat’s a gúd þing ðō

      • zerofk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        That looks unironically great. Relatively easy to read and as far as I could tell, internally consistent. Two things current English spelling lacks.

        • KSP Atlas@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          23 hours ago

          I’ve worked on it as a personal writing system for probably like a year or so now

          Y’v werkt on it az a personal ryting sistem for probabli lyk a jēr or sō nü

          • Logi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            16 hours ago

            One major issue is that it’ll expose all regional differences in pronunciation in the spelling and now we’ll disagree about the spelling instead.

            • KSP Atlas@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              We already do though, one’s color is another’s colour and one’s spelled is another’s spelt

              Those would be kuler and spelt in my dialect and writing system

    • Cousin Mose@lemmy.hogru.ch
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      The UK accent is actually more modern than that of the US because the US imported the UK one around the time of colonization.

      • FishFace@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        The US one evolved as well, just preserved rhoticity which is a major feature. There’s no “UK accent” (nor “us accent”) either - West country accents for example are still rhotic

        • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          23 hours ago

          West country accents for example are still rhotic

          Good thing, too, pirates would sound silly saying, “Ahhhhh, shivah me timbahs!”

          • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            Sure but even that isn’t all encompassing. I’m from SoCal and my accent/dialect has so many archaicisms that I’m probably one of the only people under 50 with the damned thing. What I get for being around old people I guess.

            Though I do suppress into something approaching the general accent when talking to others, mostly because for example Mountain Dew gets mangled into münten doo.

      • Rothe@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        No, that is garbled nonsense based on the misunderstanding of a factoid.

    • faintwhenfree@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      UK is the worst, US makes sense at least to some degree.

      Gloucestershire - pronounced glostershire Warwick - pronounced warrick And there like hundreds of these weird ones.

      • arudesalad@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        2 days ago

        Place names are cheating. Almost all of them come from old/other languages that have very little resemblance to modern english.