• Cruxifux@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Ok great but how did they figure out you could EAT IT if you did a shitload of seemingly random shit to it that you don’t have to do with, like, any other crop?

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      1 month ago

      You don’t have to do all of that to eat it, you just have to do all of that to make bread. You can make bread from oats, you can also process it less and make porridge.

    • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      All you need to do to make wheat edible is soak it in water to make it soft enough to chew. Wheat in water is “gruel”.

      You can improve upon it by boiling, which will make porridge, or baking, which will dehydrate the gruel into a primitive bread. The drained, starchy liquid, if left to sit for awhile, will become a primitive ale. Pre-grinding makes it easier to eat.

      Every dietary use is an evolutionary progression from soaking wheat in water.

      • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yup, it’s not so much that wheat requires all of this processing, it just makes it tastier and easier to eat.

        I reckon that after inventing farming, people probably just had a lot more time on their hands, so they sat around trying to come up with ways to avoid having to eat the same boring gruel every day.