• Samsy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Can’t believe people always use this crypto-spam browser.

      • Valarie@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        I use it for school shit because they don’t work with iceraven(my preferred mobile Firefox fork)

    • XLE@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      Brave and Firefox are very competitive when it comes to pushing unnecessary “features” on their users. (Remember when Mozilla bought an NFT and AI company to put a shopping toolbar in their browser?)

      • megopie@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Comparing brave and fire fox is like comparing librewolf and chrome. When people suggest using a privacy browser other than brave, they’re not saying “just use fire fox”.

        • XLE@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          I’m just speaking on the two most popular browsers according to the survey - LibreWolf is in a league of its own for sure.

    • Hellfire103@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      Well, it does do a fantastic job of removing ads and reducing fingerprinting.

      • Samsy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        7 days ago

        So does Librewolf. What’s the benefit of brave? Chrome-based? Checked chromium from time to time and don’t think chrome is superior over Firefox.

        • Hellfire103@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          6 days ago

          Neither do I. I use Mullvad Browser, which is based on Firefox.

          Brave has its own content blocking system, which is on-par with uBO and better than uBO Lite. I tested it myself a while back, and Cover Your Tracks, Fingerprint.com, and CreepJS indicated that it was incredibly difficult to fingerprint: moreso than Librewolf, but slightly less so than Tor/Mullvad.

          That said, however, PrivacyTests.org indicates that Librewolf blocks more tracking technologies than Brave, so it’s possible things have changed since I last experimented with browsers other than Tor and Mullvad.

    • holomorphic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 days ago

      It keeps my data in plain text files, integrates well with git and simply does the most things I always wanted a note taking application to do, when compared with anything else I have tried so far.

      Yes, I would be happier with an open source application, but the first two are hard requirements for me, which already removes the majority of the alternatives.

      On the other hand, I will never understand why anyone would use brave, given how shady the thing is.

    • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Probably because it is all portable and in markdown, the devs are widely available and it is open enough that community, open source plugins can be easily made which allow you to make custom workflows that simply aren’t available in any alternatives.

      Linking is significantly easier and better than any alternative I have tried which significantly lowers the effort of documentation which is the largest hurdle for most people. As all social media shit apps have taught us, ultra low-effort beginning of a habit is the key to consistent use.

      And if the dev enshittifies, all of your notes are safe in plaintext markdown and not a proprietary format and can be imported and cleaned up in your choice of new editor and fix the linking.

  • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    How can Thunderbird be the third favourite Email service, when it’s not even an email service? It’s a mail user agent.

    Or do they mean the Thundermail service available in the Thunderbird Pro Subscription?

      • XLE@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        Do you think the statistics are representative of the overall userbase? To me, this suggests recency bias (or maybe people who misunderstood the question, because it made me do a double-take too). Either way, Thunderbird using its established branding and reputation is a great move.

        • pkjqpg1h@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          I think Firefox’s usage is more, Proton Mail is less, Addy.io is more, DuckDuckGo Email Alias is less, DuckDuckGo search usage is more, Matrix is more (btw Matrix is not app :D), Bitwarden is less, Obsidian is more (unfortunately it’s closed-source), uBO is more, Windscribe is more, AI usage is more

  • FoundFootFootage78@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    I’m considering swapping from Proton Mail to Fastmail. The fact that it allows 3-year subscriptions is good (I’d prefer a lifetime plan but I understand why that’s a non-starter), the fact that it’s based local to me is good too.

    EDIT: I wish it also at least offered a rolling 3-year subscription.

    • XLE@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      If you download it from the FDroid store, yes. If you download it from the Google Play Store, no.

      (I just tested this to make sure, because I know it sounds weird.)

      • ItsMyVault101@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        I was asking because I used Mullvad in the past and I love the fact that not even they know who you are because to them you are just a random generated number, which occasionally gets 5€ deposited.

        • smeg@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          You can use a free or paid account but some time last year (I think) they also made it so you can use it without even logging in (on android at least)

    • Alb@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Yes but it is free (email address) with an acces to 5 countries (Netherlands, Romania, Japan and 2 others i never used). To extend it worldwide you have to subscribe to a premium account.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    You know I just remembered that no one actually confirmed whether DuckDuckGo wasn’t just a honeypot for the NSA because it didn’t become big until after thr Snowden leaks lol.

    • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      well I still don’t get how are they legitimately funding their services, even before they started running their free AI chat proxy.