Dbzero Governance Vote Post https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/63525728

Ahoy mateys!

A few of our users have recently pointed out that a lot of the pro-Zionist accounts on the fediverse nowadays seem to come from the feddit.org instance.

But whatever the excuse happens to be, they need to do better imo. Israel is currently the most violent, fascist and genocidal nation state in the Middle East (if you exclude the US military bases there). And yet feddit.org seems to regard the Palestinians fighting against Israel’s ongoing illegal occupation of their land as the real terrorists. …

More context

Our instance already voted to ban pro-Zionist accounts (see https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/60585441 for reference) and the rule that was implemented is here: Golden Rule #8.

As further context, you can find relevant comments and discussion in this post by a banned feddit admin in MoG (that fact they chose to post in MoG is in itself quite telling), and this post about their defederation from quokk.au over anti-semitism allegations has recently become active again. …

Note 2: If you think feddit.org deserves a full instance ban instead, or have alternative suggestions, then please leave your comments below. If enough people think that’s the better option, then we’ll do that instead.

In the end the Post had around 70% of support by dbzer0 users, who in the comments also called for defederation.

Here is a Link to Dbzer0 instances tab https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/instances where if you go to blocked instances you can see fedddit.org is now defederated

i dont think feddit has made a post now, but when they do i will add it

  • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    5 days ago

    Oh, yeah, “They removed my comment where I’m just an asshole and telling people to kill themselves, they are such zionists 😭”

    The fuck is wrong with you guys?

    • vga@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      The regular: too much internet, not enough grass being touched.

      • lmmarsano@group.lt
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Cool non-answer. What part of civility rules typical across lemmy such as dbzer0’s own

        Don’t be shitty. i.e. telling people to kill themselves, or bad-jacketing is bannable.

        allows exceptions for unhinged promotion of violence against commenters whom we unreasonably allege or “bad-jacket” as Zionist? Uncivil denunciations of Zionism are uncivil; therefore, moderators enforcing civility must prosecute. No evidence was given the moderators penalize civil denunciations of Zionism. Enforcing civility doesn’t imply Zionism.

        This is basic logic. Denying basic logic implies staggering stupidity or dishonesty.

        • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          4 days ago

          Dbzer0 civility rules aim to protect marginalized people from harassment. feddit.org’s are being deployed to protect Zionism from criticism while tone-policing Palestinians and their allies. These aren’t the same thing just because they both use the word ‘civility.’

          feddit isn’t exactly enforcing civility neutrally. They’re silencing anti-Zionism while treating Zionist positions as the default that deserves civil engagement. That’s a political choice with the fig leaf of ‘just following orders the law’, hardly ‘basic logic’. But thanks for explaining to a silly girl like me silly-liberator

      • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yeah, the good old “You are a Nazi for following rules”-thing. Because everyone who follows rules does so indly, except for oneself.

        • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          4 days ago

          One may well ask: “How can you advocate breaking some laws and obeying others?” The answer lies in the fact that there are two types of laws: just and unjust. I would be the first to advocate obeying just laws. One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. I would agree with St. Augustine that “an unjust law is no law at all.”

          • Martin Luther King Jr. in Birmingham Jail 1963
          • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            4 days ago

            How would you categorize the community rules “Be nice to each other”, “Don’t insult each other” and “Don’t call for violence”? Just or unjust, dair or unfair, sensible or dumb, expedient or not?

              • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                15
                ·
                4 days ago

                Why the whataboutism? Please answer my question and do not answer with whataboutism or the discussion is over.

                • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  13
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  you started the whataboutism with 'what about the community rules"

                  please answer my question and do not answer with whataboutism or the discussion is over.

                  • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    10
                    arrow-down
                    11
                    ·
                    4 days ago

                    Wrong. I criticised the db0-governance post for delivering supposed evidence for feddit.org-admins’ supposed zionism that actually only were evidence for db0-users behaving like assholes.

                    And since you can only deflect and not actually argue, this discussion is over. In case you wonder why I won’t answer furher comments by you, I can’t see them anymore since I place you on my blocklist. People like you are the reason I’m really considering placing lemmy.ml as an instance on that list. Well done.

            • Uruanna@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              Easy: unjust, unfair, dumb.

              Nazis easily pretend to be the nice people following the rules and if you get angry you’re the bad one. Don’t be nice to Nazis. Yell at them, insult them, punch them. Enforcing laws to protect oppressors is nothing more than protecting oppressors. “The only legitimate violence is state violence” and all that propaganda.

              The Nazis are the ones breaking the “be nice” rule in the first place, they just do it while speaking nicely, they talk about enforcing rules and protecting order, but somehow they always dodge the question of how many people their order is killing. That’s not being nice. The rule is only there to forbid you for fighting back.

              If you think that the “be nice” rule should punish calls to take down Israel or contest german support for the genocide, but not punish that same support for the genocide because it’s nice and polite… You’re just protecting the genocide. It doesn’t matter if anti-genocide comments are not nice enough for you - they shouldn’t have to be nice. Especially not when the German government literally makes it illegal to denounce Israel, even nicely.

              A “be nice” rule is bad when there’s another rule that says it’s illegal to denounce genocide.