• Ranulph@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 days ago

    I never see the results of all the asking either, the large cheques that you see posted in the front of these stores never seem to amount to the millions of dollars you would think. In the end they will claim the value of the money given as tax break for the business and you get poorer. Funny that.

  • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    And they get credit for donating even tho it was actually their customers.

    • nathanjent@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      In many cases they also cause the child hunger by paying their employees a wage so low that food assistance is required.

    • motruck@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      They do not get credit for facilitating your donation. This is a misunderstanding of how donating works based on when I looked it up after saying the same thing. They do it mainly to virtue signal. Either way I share the sentiment of the post.

      • dogdeanafternoon@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        I think by credit he means they get to brag about how much they “donated”.

        Everyone should know by now they don’t get any tax advantages.

    • ɔiƚoxɘup@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      If only in the form of a tax break. You’re literally donating to the company asking for the cash.

  • Lemmynated@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    They want you to give them a tax break. It’s a scam like all capitalism is.

  • Lanske@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Bloody Shell asked me the other day if i wanted to donate money to some shell sponsored forests. Yeah right, fuck off multinational capitalist scum

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 days ago

    I always decline, without exception.

    1. It’s not my duty to pull from my personal funds to support others. I ALWAYS vote to help others with my tax dollars.

    2. I don’t actually know where my money is going. I haven’t researched these organizations. I don’t know where my money ends up.

    • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      So what you’re saying is you’d rather have your money taken from you by force, as long as it’s lawful and you get to pretend you have a say in how it’s used…

      • qaeta@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        I think what they are saying is that they’d rather the burden be distributed equitably across the populace instead of placing the burden entirely on good people.

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    I’ve been given the “corporations should be able to run their business how they want and government shouldn’t ban things like they banned weed” too many times on lemmy.

    We should ban for profit corporations from doing certain things, this is one of them. We know they’re using the money as a tax writeoff. Ban this shit. Not everything is drugs.

    Edit: looks like afaik its not tax deductible for corporations to do this though I would not put it past a small business or local manager to try it. I would prefer other methods for charitable donations other than how well they negotiate with box stores, etc.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    I often pass an intersection where a woman is selling ice cold water bottles, and in the other direction, her husband (I assume) is selling flowers. I almost always buy 2 bottles of water from her.

    I know that my money is going directly to help a hard working family, instead of some “charity,” where only about 20% goes to the actual research, while executives take millions in compensation.

    • Blo0dixte4rz@hilariouschaos.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I used to watch this happen all the time in South Carolina where I used to live… But I also used to do it myself, I’d be like, well hell if we’re gonna sit out here and panhandle, we might as well do it in a group! You knew one thing - that caused a need for - the other thing and then - that other thing would belong to the next thing. It’s a good base strategy.

  • FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    Well they will make the donation, but they’ll do it with your money, and then they’ll take the tax deduction for it, and reward themselves with a nice fat end of year bonus from the tax savings. Isn’t capitalism fun?

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      That’s not how tax deductions work. All the write-offs allow is for them to not count the money donated as income, so they make the same amount of money on the sale whether or not you donate.

      The benefit to the company is PR or donating to a non-profit with a mission that aligns with their corporate goals. For instance, Bass Pro may ask you to donate to wildlands preservation non-profits that maintain environments in which people fish and hunt.

      • FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        But isn’t it true that whatever they don’t pay in taxes via writeoffs, they get to keep and use however they want? They might choose not to give themselves a bigger bonus with those savings on taxes, but…I do doubt it for some reason

        • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 days ago

          Write-offs are deductions from income, not reductions in taxes owed. They only get to deduct the taxes they would have paid if they had kept the donations.

          Let’s imagine their annual income was $10,000,000. Their nominal tax rate would have them owing $2,100,000.

          If they received a $100,000 in donations, that would make their income 10,100,000. But with the donations they could write off the 100 grand, reducing their tax bill by $21,000, for a total of $2,100,000.

          Either way, they pay the same in taxes with or without the donations.

          • FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            I stand corrected, thanks! I always assume they’re finding a way to directly enrich themselves further, because they often are.

        • qaeta@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          It ends up being net zero. They’re only writing off the money you donated. They still have to count the money you donated towards their overall revenue, increasing their tax bill, but then they pass the donation on, allowing them to write it off, reducing their overall revenue (and thus their tax bill) to what it would have been if you hadn’t donated.

        • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          If they donate money out of their own profits, they CAN write that off. Which of course is also money you gave them, except it’s money you gave them in order to buy their products, not for the purpose of having them donate it.

  • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Infuriates me as well. I don’t think they realize how it looks and sounds in 2026.