fubarx@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 28 天前Ars Technica Fires Reporter After AI Controversy Involving Fabricated Quotesfuturism.comexternal-linkmessage-square57linkfedilinkarrow-up1540arrow-down16
arrow-up1534arrow-down1external-linkArs Technica Fires Reporter After AI Controversy Involving Fabricated Quotesfuturism.comfubarx@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 28 天前message-square57linkfedilink
minus-squareZarxrax@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up45·28 天前I mean they fired the guy, and the guy took full responsibility for the errors. If that’s not blaming the journalist, I don’t know what is.
minus-squarejaybone@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down36·28 天前Tbf, I didn’t read the article. But the title mentions “controversy.” Also are people so lazy they can’t make up their own fake quotes? Was AI really needed here?
minus-squareprotist@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up36·28 天前 Tbf, I didn’t read the article. But the title… Say no more. Please
minus-squareKhanzarate@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·28 天前Are people so lazy they can’t even bother to read the headline? Maybe an AI would’ve been useful here to generate its own defense.
minus-squarebrambc@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·28 天前Being too lazy to read is one thing, not being too lazy to then comment is a whole other kind of existence.
I mean they fired the guy, and the guy took full responsibility for the errors. If that’s not blaming the journalist, I don’t know what is.
Tbf, I didn’t read the article. But the title mentions “controversy.” Also are people so lazy they can’t make up their own fake quotes? Was AI really needed here?
Say no more. Please
Are people so lazy they can’t even bother to read the headline? Maybe an AI would’ve been useful here to generate its own defense.
Being too lazy to read is one thing, not being too lazy to then comment is a whole other kind of existence.
JFC RTFM