Crony's Dungeon
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
floofloof@lemmy.ca to Privacy@programming.devEnglish · 2 months ago

GrapheneOS refuses to comply with new age verification laws for operating systems — group says it will never require personal information

www.tomshardware.com

external-link
message-square
12
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • android@lemmy.world
172
external-link

GrapheneOS refuses to comply with new age verification laws for operating systems — group says it will never require personal information

www.tomshardware.com

floofloof@lemmy.ca to Privacy@programming.devEnglish · 2 months ago
message-square
12
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • android@lemmy.world
Doesn’t care if its devices can’t be sold in regions that require ID verification.
  • Jack@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 months ago

    Take notes systemd

    • atopi@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      when did systemd add or say they plan to add age verification?

      • Jack@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah there was some drama about it.

        https://www.sambent.com/the-engineer-who-tried-to-put-age-verification-into-linux-5/

        This blog explains the situation but also attacks the developer that did it and I do not think he is to blame here.

        • atopi@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          that isnt age verification though, it is not verifying the age; its just asking the user to input their age, something websites and apps have been doing for ages

          • endlesseden@pyfedi.deep-rose.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            That’s the first step to it. SystemD doesn’t need to store any private data like that. Like most changes, if it’s done in stages, instead of all at once. It’s much harder to revert…

          • Jack@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yeah fair

          • gnuthing [they/them]@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Personally, I don’t want my kid to use a device that is broadcasting their age in any way. Just makes them a target to Epstein bros. Going to a site that is asking age verification is different, there’s a voluntary step there

Privacy@programming.dev

privacy@programming.dev

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !privacy@programming.dev

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 248 users / day
  • 1.12K users / week
  • 2.48K users / month
  • 6.17K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 4.5K subscribers
  • 1.55K Posts
  • 6.8K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Ategon@programming.dev
  • danielintempesta@programming.dev
  • BE: 0.19.13
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org