• CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      101
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      26 days ago

      Figures. Patents are the backbone of capitalism. Some say it invented capitalism as we know it.

      • WesternInfidels@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        25 days ago

        Patents are a (relatively speaking) newfangled trick to turn ideas into legal “capital.” In the same way that a corporation “is” a person.

        The backbone of capitalism? I’m not following that.

        • ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          25 days ago

          Patents are a way to spread knowledge, whole still offering some [time limited] protections. Before them, trade secrets were the norm, and way too much knowledge was lost with it’s creators.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      25 days ago

      It’s an outdated legalism. 250 years ago, the patent office operated as an incentive to record and register ideas to the public in exchange for exclusive commercial license.

      Now that simply isn’t an issue

    • BoofStroke@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      25 days ago

      Software and business method patents have always been bullshit.

      Patent the machine, not how you use it. Software is just instructions to a machine.

    • biscuit@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      24 days ago

      AV1 is right there. One has to wonder why all the device manufacturers rushed to implement HEVC but allowed AV1 to dillydally.

    • tabular@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      18 days ago

      Perhaps patients have their place but software patients make no sense. One big issue is that it is not practical to avoid writing a system that already exists because there are many, many ways to describe the same software system. It’s so difficult to search every term that might be used that multiple people could have already patented the same thing and be unaware the other exists.