His investment in Objection.ai points to a new model: private investigations, AI verdicts, and accountability mechanisms that operate outside democratic institutions.
So when the food crisis hits from the straight of Hormuz fertilizer issue, maybe let’s eat this guy first.
Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.
Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.
I’m fine with just euthanizing them the old fashioned way; cancerous growth can only be allowed for so long before the rest of the body fails.
History has shown time and again that if you give the lower classes nothing to live for or buy into a society then violent revolution usually follows.

apparently hes also behind CLAVICULAR suddenly being in the media. everyone said his rise in streaming/spotlight felt so unnatural, now we know why. thiel was funding him to be this way.
Just what we need, a justice system based on pre-existing biases
Putting aside the problems in the current system, let’s not call Thiel’s system a justice system until we can see some results and verify they are just, 'k?
It’ll NEVER be a “”“justice”“” system; it’ll just be a way for the Ultra-Wealthy to legitimize their oppression and handwave the consequences as a “decision by AI”. Mysteriously, oh-so-mysteriously, the verdicts will ALWAYS align with Thiel’s interests.
The justice system was always about helping the rich
How is this not treason
How is the current administration not treason. Answers your initial question, I think.
Does it really matter if checks and balances have been wiped out? Seems like just a label.
JD Vance is still riding his dick.
so is sam altman, his other puppet.
Because he’s… Say it with me…
RICH AND WHITE!
Because it operates within the law? It’s a binding arbitration company.
I feel like this is the origin story to a script of a film Chris Pratt would definitely star in… …Oh wait…
Good fiml though, it start slowly though
I was just amazed that Amazon out of all companies would put out a film admitting that AI justice would be flawed.
deleted by creator
Even the villains know when something is bad for them.
It anthromorphise Ai

Motherfucker wants to create his own Eagle Eye.
So he read that Frank Herbert quote about “permitted other men with machines to enslave them” and thought it was a great idea
lol, he publicly identifies as a Sauron cosplayer
cf. $companyName
…but he’s actually more like a sweaty Zorg, as a cartoon villain.
I imagine he’s going to try and deploy this in that totally unregulated Freedom City that he and Trump are trying to launch on some federal property in CA.
Nah, he is going to deploy it as the de-facto arbitrator for private industry. You wave your write to sue virtually every time you sign a TOS. This will replace arbitration because that is already a parallel legal system exclusively for corporations.
Peter Thiel should be in prison.
wouldve been if gawker wasnt sued to the ground, apparently they were reporting on things like these decades ago, he was just using the gay excuse to obfuscate his role and bankrolling hot-dog skin hogans lawsuit.
Oh wow, The Antichrist himself spinning up his own justice system. Sounds much fairer than a jury of your peers.
It’s only parallel for now.
Once we contract judges and the justice system to Palantir to avoid costly things like humans passing judgement, then think of the savings!
That or we get one of those Network State Praxis type things.
Without reading the article, algorithms have been used in sentencing for some time, well over ten years, to detrimental effect.
At least with algorithms the calculation is transparent. AI is so much worse because it’s a black box
AI is bullshit, not that different, it’s the most hyped bullshit since idk. We are being played on this, amongst a great many other things.
Tech is a freedom ending thing don’'t get me wrong, if we don’t organize.
It’s different in this case specifically, because AI is completely opaque, and the calculation the court uses is not at all









