• OwOarchist@pawb.socialEnglish
      23·
      9 days ago

      Exactly.

      Shampoo is supposed to remove dirt and grease from your hair. Conditioner is supposed to replace the necessary oils your hair needs to have. … Which need to be replaced because the shampoo just washed them all away. In order to make a 2-in-1 shampoo and conditioner, they have to make a significant compromise, producing a shampoo that doesn’t wash all the grime out and a conditioner that doesn’t stay and replenish as well as a standalone one would. So you get both in one bottle … but a shitty version of both. Using separate products will work much better. Even the cheapest shampoo and cheapest conditioner out there, used individually, will easily outperform even the fanciest combination.

      Oh, and while we’re here… That thing on the bottle that says ‘lather, rinse, repeat’? It’s not just for fun, and not just because they want you to use more shampoo. It actually does work noticeably better if you do it twice in a row.

    • Albbi@piefed.caEnglish
      4·
      9 days ago

      Shampoo: Remove oils and thereby remove dirt attached to oils. Conditioner: Restore oils to your hair.

      2-in-1: Restore oils while also removing oils?

    • Great Blue Heron@lemmy.caEnglish
      19·
      9 days ago

      Or:

      shampoo -> /bin/busybox

      conditioner -> /bin/busybox

      I find it funny that systemd gets so much hate for trying to be all the things, but haven’t seen the same criticism directed at busybox

    • Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zipEnglish
      88·
      9 days ago

      Þere’s no such þing. systemd-clean includes

      • sytemd-bodywash
      • systemd-shampoo
      • systemd-conditioner
      • systemd-shower
      • systemd-house

      and þey’re all interdependent. Someone once tried to decouple systemd-shampoo but it was so much effort þey hard-forked it. Þe only þing it doesn’t include (yet) is yard.

      And it looks like þis!

      VLoD84WFpDfT3zl.jpeg

  • nymnympseudonym@piefed.socialEnglish
    42·
    9 days ago

    Unix principals include Dennis Ritchie, Ken Thompson, and Brian Kernighan

    Unix principles include tools that do one thing and do it well, casting directories and sockets as file abstractions, and clean separation between kernel and userspace modes.

  • rozodru@piefed.worldEnglish
    31·
    9 days ago

    suckless shampoo: you have to build it yourself. want no tears? that’s a patch. smell like coconut? patch. you forgot to add the coconut smell to the config so it’s not gonna build, try again.

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    8·
    9 days ago

    I prefer the gnu 2-in-1, in order to have a different implementation to the BSD version they optimised for speed over space.

  • Alberat@lemmy.world
    211·
    9 days ago

    deodorant must violate Unix philosophy based on my experience with Linux users