• VinegarChunks@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    Five star rating system was dumb because almost every rating was 1 or 5 stars. It was right to replace with a thumbs up/thumbs down system.

    They stopped showing the number of thumbs down. They did not take away the thumbs down button.

    • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah it’s still better than FB which doesn’t even have a thumbs down. Fortunately I’m only on FB for my job, not being able to downvote makes me crazy.

    • BlackPenguins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      Can confirm this. I created a 5 Star system for my recipe app. Had the feature for a year, I didn’t use it once. I just couldn’t justify the difference between a 4 or 5 Star. Or 2 and 3 Star.

      Switched to dislike, like, love buttons. Nice and discrete. Been using it for weeks now.

    • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      Five star rating system was dumb because almost every rating was 1 or 5 stars. It was right to replace with a thumbs up/thumbs down system.

      That assumes that the only use for ratings is for averaging the aggregate votes across all users. Nope. Sometimes for a specific user they like to be able to see the granularity of their own ratings for their own use. And even if it is a public aggregated thing the rating service can still treat all 1-2 stars as downvotes and 4-5 stars as upvotes while it’s easier to use the simpler algorithms, but to still store the more precise data for analyzing correlations at greater detail.

      Big tech covered the world in trillion-parameter AI models and couldn’t even figure out what to do with 5-star ratings differently from upvotes/downvotes? It’s ridiculous.

  • mechoman444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    3 days ago

    But they did this for one reason and one reason only to appease the companies they advertise for.

    That is all. Marketers like safe mundane non-volatile markets. Having a lot of dislikes on a video creates a connotation to the advertisement being played on it.

    This is nothing more than marketing.

    And don’t forget marketing is one of the most evil institutions ever created by humanity.

      • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Well, I wouldn’t say unreliable. It does not match the real dislike count, because it only knows about the people using the extension. It’s like the difference between the official rating of an app on the google play store and some third party user review site. It’s not that one is more reliable than other, just different people contribute.

  • HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Every step:

    “Let’s make it more difficult for people to realize the video they’re about to watch is hated (so people keep coming back for more and advertisers keep paying us more), but not in a way that is blatant so we lose a significant portion of our userbase.”

  • homes@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    I use the super secret system of telling my favorite YouTubers how disappointed I am that they’re not gay when they announce that they’re having a baby

  • GhostFace@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    I don’t mind everything except the last one.

    People brigade content. It’s just better to use other metrics, like how long did someone engage with the content.

    • Gathorall@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      People do brigade content too. But that isn’t a reason to hide the data. It is the viewer’s responsibility to ponder the rating. People talk about critical thinking, but hiding the tools to practice it doesn’t actually help people to get better at it.