• SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    some do.

    I have a small community masto instance and don’t. If my users want to block the instance, it’s literally 2 clicks and a confirmation away.

    Doing to server wide is massively patronizing towards the users

        • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          But can’t Mastodon post on Lemmy and Lemmy can’t block instances on an individual basis? That’s the way I understand it currently stands. I don’t want threads showing up in my feed and would like to block them.

      • SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        yup. And that’s what we did. The majority of people either didn’t care either way or didn’t want to block it. With way more “don’t block” than “block”. So that’s that. At least for now

    • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      You might want to look up what patronize means, in the common phrase “don’t patronize me” it’s used sarcastically.

      Essentially, replace the word with “helpful” in your sentence, and you’ll see why it doesn’t fit.

      • SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        yeah, I get what you mean. But it’s still mostly fitting in the way I feel about it. Basically: users can think for themselves. They don’t need me to take care of the bit scary world out there.

        Doing so for a whole instance feels super condecending. “I know better than you what you want. I’m going to block it”