I know Congress needs to be involved to actually declare war, but there have been a number of times where something was kicked off by presidential authority alone.

If Biden wanted to, could he start a conflict against Russia without congressional approval. If not, what approval would he need? If so, what would be the theoretical limitations to his power and military authority?

I am already assuming people would want some definition of what “conflict” would mean in this hypothetical scenario. So let’s say it means Biden authorized US troops at the Ukrainian border and had them launching shells into Russia.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    either the military disobeys the president (which is unconstitutional) or the president violates separation of powers (which is unconstitutional)

    I don’t see how disobeying your boss is unconstitutional. It may be detrimental to your job but it’s not unconstitutional

    As other posters have said, there’s lots of wiggle room in who can start military action, starting with the War Powers Act, so no violation of separation of powers either

    • SSTF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I don’t see how disobeying your boss is unconstitutional.

      Article II, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution gives the President authority to command the U.S. military. The military refusing a lawful order is therefore going against the chain of command created by the Constitution.

    • originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      I mean in the literal sense the president is commander in chief of the armed forces. Disobeying their orders is defying their constitutional authority.

      The issue is obviously more complicated than that just-so story. My point is not that if the president says to shoot the speaker of the house, soldiers must do it or they are behaving unconstitutionally. My point is that the president has the authority to direct the military to do things, and when the president uses that authority to undermine democracy in the US that act is a constitutional crisis because it pits two branches of government against each other in an irreconcilable way.