His win is a direct result of the Supreme Court’s decision in a pivotal LGBTQ+ rights case.

  • devz0r@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I disagree with him, and I think he’s bigoted. But I don’t think anyone has the right to his labor and that he should be legally forced to photograph things that he doesn’t want to photograph. And it’s not like photography is a business that anyone can corner the market of in a small town or anything like that, all you need is a camera. It’s the most common side hustle I see people try.

    • darq@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      And how do you differentiate between this and say, a shop, or a doctor? Do LGBT people not “have the right to the labour” of those services?

      I disagree with that framing entirely. But I’m curious to know how you would differentiate.

      • devz0r@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think the difference comes down to creative outlets. Just like with the “create a website for same-sex weddings”. I also feel a photographer should be able to deny a Trump themed wedding or cake. But if it’s a general service or product offered to everyone, you shouldn’t be able to deny a person just for being gay or black or anything protected. I don’t know if I’m elaborating my thoughts about it well but do you get where I’m coming from?

        • jacaw@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          A wedding photographer offers their services to everyone having weddings. If that photographer refuses to photograph same-sex weddings, is that not the same as denying service to someone over their sexuality?

          • devz0r@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            You make a good point and I thought the same thing after I made my initial comments. Another one I thought about was what if a person truly strongly believed in segregation, even maybe it being a part of their religion. Does that mean it’s ok for them to deny black people? That makes me deeply uncomfortable to put it lightly; I don’t think that is justifiable.

            At the same time, there is something very personal about creative pursuits. Graphic artists can reject any idea and they don’t have to justify it. And this is something that is custom made for each customer. If the artist isn’t interested, and even is morally opposed to performing the work, even if they were legally required to do it, is it going to be their best work? Can they be penalized for deliberately doing a terrible job? I don’t know