sag@lemm.ee to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoChad VLClemm.eeimagemessage-square98linkfedilinkarrow-up11.18Karrow-down114
arrow-up11.17Karrow-down1imageChad VLClemm.eesag@lemm.ee to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square98linkfedilink
minus-squareAVincentInSpace@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up41·edit-21 year agoForget playback. How was that video file recorded? How do you even store data that fast, let alone encode it?
minus-squareAVincentInSpace@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20·1 year agoOhhhhhh. It’s a video decoder torture test. “If your app can play this it can play anything” sort of deal. That makes sense. Also makes sense that VLC puked.
minus-squareulterno@lemmy.kde.socialBannedlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 year ago1 Terrabyte RAM with a 64GB RAM Drive perhaps?
minus-squareDacoTaco@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up30·edit-21 year agoVlc has hardware acceleration afaik. I think its more a case of the ffmpeg codec not supporting it yet because what the actual fuck haha
minus-squaregentooer@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·1 year agoYeah, I think it’s a good idea to try ffplay if VLC (or mpv) fail.
minus-squarestebo@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up24·1 year ago I think you need hardware acceleration for a video like this. ok but why would anyone have a video like that
minus-squareBelgdore@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 year agoMaybe some kind of super slow motion high resolution type thing?
minus-squareℛ𝒶𝓋ℯ𝓃@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·1 year agoYeah I could definitely see this for slo-mo and data recording in an actual laboratory setting that requires it to be as accurate as humanly possible. Idk if this is a standard though I’m not a scientist.
minus-squarestebo@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agobut if you’re gonna watch it in slow motion anyways then why isn’t it saved as a slow video that is much longer?
minus-squaretortiscu@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Cinema_Package
minus-squareulterno@lemmy.kde.socialBannedlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 year agoDeleted by creator.
minus-squarepwndave@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoRight! Sorry, I assumed this was regular JPEG
minus-squarenotthebees@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoCertain programs can do multithreaded downloads on ftp servers. Winscp is one that can do it. Idk about other software
deleted by creator
Forget playback. How was that video file recorded? How do you even store data that fast, let alone encode it?
deleted by creator
Ohhhhhh. It’s a video decoder torture test. “If your app can play this it can play anything” sort of deal. That makes sense.
Also makes sense that VLC puked.
deleted by creator
1 Terrabyte RAM with a 64GB RAM Drive perhaps?
Vlc has hardware acceleration afaik. I think its more a case of the ffmpeg codec not supporting it yet because what the actual fuck haha
Yeah, I think it’s a good idea to try ffplay if VLC (or mpv) fail.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
ok but why would anyone have a video like that
deleted by creator
Maybe some kind of super slow motion high resolution type thing?
Yeah I could definitely see this for slo-mo and data recording in an actual laboratory setting that requires it to be as accurate as humanly possible. Idk if this is a standard though I’m not a scientist.
but if you’re gonna watch it in slow motion anyways then why isn’t it saved as a slow video that is much longer?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Cinema_Package
Deleted by creator.
JPEG2000 = not lossless
deleted by creator
Right! Sorry, I assumed this was regular JPEG
Where can I try this
deleted by creator
Certain programs can do multithreaded downloads on ftp servers. Winscp is one that can do it. Idk about other software