• Iceblade@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Your study is locked behind a paywall :(

    For a fun comparison, I usually run the numbers for our 2004 Audi A2 with biodiesel (HVO100) against the most efficient electric vehicles, based on Swedish grid emissions and then US emissions.

    The Audi runs at 4L/100km (real world numbers) x 256g/L (compensated emissions according to Neste) = 1024g/100km

    Versus the Hyundai Ioniq 6 (current most efficient EV according to mestmotor in real world testing) with a consumption of 15.5kWh/100km * 41g/kWh (Sweden according to ourworldindata) * 1.15 (charging losses) = 730.8g/100km.

    For the US that’s 15.5kWh/100km * 369g/kWh *1.15 = 6577.4g/100km.

    So compared to a US EV our car runs with a whopping 6th of the real emissions. Assuming the same production impact that your article linked it would take 11tons*10000000grams/(1024-730.8)grams/km = 37517 kilometers

    • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Interesting analysis but I don’t think biodiesel is very comparable for most people. Also, very hard to account for emissions with biofuels, so I’d be curious how accurate your numbers are.