• foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    If it were so simple, you’d think we’d be able to put our thumb down on what consciousness “is” and “isn’t,” where it comes from, etc.

      • foggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        A nobel prize if you could prove it, which you cannot currently.

        Literally the biggest, hairiest problem in computation right now. Only thing keeping us from blowing the lid off AGI is not knowing or even remotely understanding what consciousness is.

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Our brain is literally nothing but electrical impulses.

          We don’t know what specific arrangement of impulses, but we know 100% that it’s electrical impulses.

          • foggy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Again, it has been yet to be proved.

            If it seems so obvious to you, please go on and prove it. You’ll die a nobel laureate rather than an armchair dbag.

            • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              What are you smoking? It’s been proved, inasmuch as “it’s daytime when the sun is out” has been proved.

              Our brain is made up of neurons firing electrical impulses.

              Consciousness is in the brain.

              Therefore, somewhere in those electrical impulses is consciousness.

              Strange you get so defensive. Maybe it’s because your psyche can’t handle the fact that there’s nothing after death, and you need to cling to whatever faint hope you have that there might be such thing as a soul?

              • zero_iq@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                No it hasn’t, and if you don’t see why, and why your explanation is incredibly simplistic and insufficient as an explanation of consciousness, you may not fully realise or understand the problem.

                I don’t believe in life after death etc. and I believe consciousness is indeed manifested somewhere in the brain (and tied to those electrical impulses in some way), yet find your explanation utterly insufficient to address the “hard problem” of consciousness. It doesn’t explain qualia, or subjective experience.

                Now obviously we do seem to have proved that consciousness is somehow related to such electrical impulses and other processes in the brain… but to say that we even begin to understand how actual subjective conscious experience arises from this is simply not true.

                For starters: your logical steps from brain uses electricity -> consciousness is in the brain -> therefore consciousness is in the electrical impulses is a non-sequitur.

                To illustrate: CPUs are made up of logic gates that utilise electricity to perform many operations. We know mathematical calculations are done in the CPU. Therefore mathematics is in the logic gates. Does that sound right to you? Is that in any way a satisfactory explanation of what maths is, or where mathemarical concepts exists or how marhs came to be? Does maths only exist in electrical logic gates?

                Doesn’t seem at all right does it? Yet that’s precisely the same leap of logic you just used.

                Now before you reply with “ah, but that’s totally different” carefully examine why you think it’s different for consciousness…

                In addition, there are more than just electrical impulses going on in the brain. Why do you choose electrical or only electrical? Do you think all electrical systems are conscious? What about a computer? What about your house electrical system? Do you draw a distinction? If so, where is the distinction? Can you accurately describe what exactly about certain electrical systems and not others gives rise to direct subjective experience and qualia? What is the precise mechanism that leads to electrons providing a conscious subjective experience? Would a thinking simulation of a brain experience the same qualia?

                If you really can’t see what I’m getting at with any of this, perhaps you might be a philosophical zombie… not actually conscious yourself. Just a chemical computer firing some impulses that perfectly simulates a conscious entity, just like an AI but in meat form. Carefully consider: how do you personally know if this is or isn’t true?

                • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Okay, I’ll give it a shot.

                  For starters: your logical steps from brain uses electricity -> consciousness is in the brain -> therefore consciousness is in the electrical impulses is a non-sequitur.

                  To illustrate: CPUs blah blah mathematics

                  Okay, fine. Consciousness is exclusively in the brain. Now your whole metaphor falls apart, because mathematics is not exclusively in the CPU. It is not subjective. It does not arise from the existence of the CPU. It is a concept separate from the CPU, or indeed any matter.

                  Now before you reply with “ah, but that’s totally different” carefully examine why you think it’s different for consciousness…

                  I thought about it, and my conclusion is “it’s because I’m not a fuckin moron” .

                  In addition, there are more than just electrical impulses going on in the brain.

                  Pedantry. “Electrical impulses” is a close enough phrase to describe a host of related but slightly different things.

                  All the rest of your questions are stupid ridiculous garbage based on some weird fixation you have with electricity. Like I said, it’s a phrase I used to avoid giving a 3 semester lecture on the minutiae of everything going on in the brain.

                  • zero_iq@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    My comment just touched the tip of an iceberg that is an entire realm of philosophical and scientific debate that has occupied some of the brightest minds, across multiple disciplines, for decades. But sure, it’s just stupid ridiculous garbage 🙄

                    You probably think you sounded really clever.