• PenisWenisGenius@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Employers aren’t required to pay ai even minimum wage though. I think the fact that ai is shitty isn’t going to be enough to save jobs.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Hot take: jobs that are easily taken by AI shouldn’t exist

      Think about it, do we really need hellish desk jobs?

      • Contramuffin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 months ago

        Sure, but the issue is that employers will try to replace non-replaceable jobs along with the replaceable ones. Eventually employers will figure it out and hire people again for the non-replaceable jobs, but in the meantime, real people with real lives will suffer

      • evranch@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        The problem is the “race to the bottom”. Sure, some grindy desk jobs can gladly be taken by AI.

        What about the jobs that AI does poorly, but when the low cost is taken into account it’s still seen as feasible?

        Think of all the horrid DTMF phone menus and barely functioning voice recognition systems. We hated these as customers, colleagues, anyone who had to use them despised them

        Cheaper than a receptionist, though.

        Now imagine that level of frustration and poor service spread across every industry at every level. We’re talking about a total collapse of productivity across the entire economy. Not only do people lose their jobs, but the work isn’t even getting done to any standard, either.

      • Opisek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        That’s just it. A century ago people thought that with the rapid development, we would not have to work anymore. So that didn’t happen.

      • Holyhandgrenade@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        Sure, I guess we don’t need writers, painters, visual artists, musicians and filmmakers. I mean, what do they do really, enrich our culture and move our souls? Pff, AI can do that easily.

      • filcuk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        Fully agreed. The main holdup is compensation for people, such as universal income.
        Not everyone can throw the towel in on a boring desk job and become a rocket surgeon.

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          You get paid based on how hard you are to replace. That’s why Cobol (old programing lang) developers make bank while the dude at star bucks makes minimum wage.

    • meliaesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      There’s definitely subscription fees and energy costs associated with enterprise level AI usage.