Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · edit-215 days agoRachael rulesh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square21fedilinkarrow-up1361arrow-down14
arrow-up1357arrow-down1imageRachael rulesh.itjust.worksCheradenine@sh.itjust.works to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · edit-215 days agomessage-square21fedilink
minus-squarevzq@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up11·15 days agoThat really depends on what cut of the film we’re talking about.
minus-squarerichieadler@lemmy.myserv.onelinkfedilinkarrow-up7·16 days agoAccording to Ridley Scott. P. K. Dick disagreed. 😁
minus-squareUndercoverUlrikHD@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down2·16 days agoI guess it depends on your reference yeah. In the movies he was a replicate
minus-squareJamesTBagg@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·15 days agoThat’s never explicitly stated in the movie. I believe it’s hinted at just enough to make you wonder. Which in turn makes you wonder what even makes a human person. In the sequel I think they pretty heavily lean on him being human.
minus-squareUndercoverUlrikHD@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-215 days agoBoth the director and actor have confirmed it though
Could Deckard check the box?
That really depends on what cut of the film we’re talking about.
Nope
According to Ridley Scott. P. K. Dick disagreed.
😁
I guess it depends on your reference yeah. In the movies he was a replicate
That’s never explicitly stated in the movie. I believe it’s hinted at just enough to make you wonder. Which in turn makes you wonder what even makes a human person. In the sequel I think they pretty heavily lean on him being human.
Both the director and actor have confirmed it though