• DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 days ago

    It’s not because “it could be worse” that it shouldn’t be better. There’s no good reason to force players to sign into a dedicated account to play a singleplayer game. It’s not because other publishers are worse that this isn’t a gaming sin. Pointing the finger to less green pastures only gives the current one a chance to match the landscape.

    • RxBrad@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      Ok, cool.

      Let’s revisit this when Rockstar gets universal adoration for GTA6, which will absolutely require a Rockstar account & launcher.

      • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 days ago

        GTA6 will almost certainly be a multiplayer game. As others have pointed out, at least there’s a logic behind it for a multiplayer game. There is exactly zero reason, other than corporate bs, to have this in a single player game. That’s been the argument in this entire thread, so GTA6 possibly getting praise while also requiring a separate account is entirely irrelevant.

        • RxBrad@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          You really think GTA6 won’t have a single player component? And that it won’t require a Rockstar account/launcher?

      • DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 days ago

        Yup. Sadly it’s always the same old song and dance. Death by a thousand cuts because basic consumer rights don’t actually exist.