• BestBouclettes@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Another case that demonstrates they’ll always comply with the law in the end. You just need to make sure your laws and your legislation are rock solid.

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      73
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      They’ll comply with the law if there are consequences.

      Has to be consequences first. Ones that actually matter. And are enforced swiftly. Like there were here.

    • mannycalavera@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      Wasn’t it a case of them ordering Elon to comply with the law, he played silly buggers with them by meming a response, so they started to take his assets away and he was like… wait no shocked Pikachu I will comply.

  • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    And that’s why means matter, not just the ends. If Twitter was banned under the premise of being a Nazi nest (as it is), it would be still banned. But for that you’d need solid legislation to force platforms to identify and kick out the Nazi. Not just an “ackshyually you need a representative, you don’t have one so Twitter isn’t operating here any more”.

    “A poor person’s happiness never lasts” - local saying.