• 4 Posts
  • 104 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 13th, 2023

help-circle


  • Bonsoir@lemmy.catoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.worldOh no
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 days ago

    French people are so bad at speaking english that those who can manage want to show it off at every opportunity.
    But in Montréal, it’s more a matter of an inferiority complex from french speakers. And the habit to be forced to speak english with those who don’t want to learn french.



  • Bonsoir@lemmy.catoComic Strips@lemmy.worldFaithful
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    30 days ago

    Well, here and now, with the original comment asking to join them. I do have some anecdotes but they aren’t really relevant here, I guess.

    Here is the CRA rule and the IRS one
    Both state that “advancement of religion” is a requirement, which is quite close to proselytizing (promoting and manifesting religious belief).
    The thing is that both countries were funded by christian people, so their definition of religion is biased towards it, so you can’t really have an individualistic religion like satanism be recognized.
    We can also note that Canada is discriminating against non-theistic religions and asks quite explicitly to “support and maintain missions and missionaries to propagate the faith”. Canada is still a religious state, after all.


  • Bonsoir@lemmy.catoComic Strips@lemmy.worldFaithful
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    30 days ago

    Proselytization refers to trying to convert someone to a religion, which they don’t do.

    They do claim it’s a religion. It is legally a religion. When they are recruiting, it is proselytism. Also, proselytism is part of the definition of a church in most countries, that is why, for instance, the Church of Satan is not legally a church in the US, because they do not proselytize. By their own saying and by the government, TST is a religion and they do proselytize.

    Where did I say they are a non-profit?

    You said it is just an NGO. I mean, yeah, but you could say that about pretty much anything. But clearly there is something more to it than the average NGO, with them being both a church and a couple for-profit organizations.


  • Bonsoir@lemmy.catoComic Strips@lemmy.worldFaithful
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    30 days ago

    They did try to put a baphomet statue in front of a 10 commandments monument in Arkansas. They are fighting for a plurality of religion, not secularism.
    If I wanted to contribute to a secular cause, I would much rather contribute to a secular organization to begin with.

    TST does not proselytize

    But the only times you hear of them is when people are trying to get more folk implied (or when they send a lawsuit, but that’s an other story). TST plays the card of a non profit when they don’t want to be associated with religious weirdos, and the card of religion when they want a special treatment. In the end it’s a knockoff religion that hijacked the name “satanism” while replicating what they denounce of christians.

    Fire is bad so we need to recruit more firefighters to fight it.

    It’s much closer to putting up advertisement against advertisement.

    They are just an NGO.

    That’s not true. It’s a bunch of for-profit organizations coupled with a recognized nonprofit church so they can be exempted from taxation. See here : https://the.satanic.wiki/index.php/The_Satanic_Wiki . Also, as a supposedly non-profit org, they do not disclose their financial information, which is usually a big red flag.



  • Bonsoir@lemmy.catoComic Strips@lemmy.worldFaithful
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    “We don’t like religious symbols in public space, so let’s put more of these, yay!”
    “Proselytism is bad, so we need to recruit more people to fight it.”
    “The guy at the top is not a Nazi anymore, so it’s fine.”

    • statements dreamed up by the utterly deranged.





  • Bonsoir@lemmy.catoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.worldAislop's Fables
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yeah, but the comparison translates poorly to software, since there is no way to “take” a whole ship, only to copy it. Whether you copy it directly or rewrite it, the material is the same, because you have the same information in the end. It would be closer to take the ship apart and rebuild it exactly the same using the same planks. Now, if you ask the AI to re-write a software in a different language, or using different patterns, that would be something else. If it writes the open-source project exactly the same, byte by byte without the license, then it’s simply breaking the terms.




  • If big corporation fail to improve their games graphics, then gamers will have to find other criterias to choose what games to buy, like gameplay and actual content.
    If anything, it will leave more space for indie games. And larger productions will either stagnate on graphics or start producing more cartoonish content.