• 0 Posts
  • 21 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 22nd, 2023

help-circle
  • I was a nuclear operator in the Navy. Here are the actual reasons:

    1. The designs are classified US military assets
    2. They are not refuleable
    3. They only come in 2 “sizes”: aircraft carrier and submarine
    4. They are not scaleable. You can just make a reactor 2x as big
    5. They require as much down time as up time
    6. They are outdated
    7. The military won’t let you interrupt their supply chain to make civilian reactors
    8. New designs over promise and underdeliver
    9. They are optimized for erratic operations (combat) not steady state (normal power loads)
    10. They are engineered assuming they have infinite sea water available for everything

    There’s more but that’s just off the top of my head







  • Poayjay@lemmy.worldtoWhite People Twitter@sh.itjust.worksSchool
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Thank you. Every time “why don’t they teach taxes in school?” comes up I want to pull my hair out. All most people have to do is copy about 10 numbers from their w2 into 10 boxes on their 1040ez, do elementary school math, and sign. That’s it. If you attended 2nd grade you learned all of this.






  • I asked Chat GPT to write six lines of square-enix dialogue. This is what it came up with:

    Character 1: “In the shadow of destiny, our paths converge, my friend.”

    Character 2: “The echoes of our past resonate in the silence of this moment.”

    Character 1: “The crystal’s light dims, and darkness whispers its name.”

    Character 2: “Yet, within the chaos, a glimmer of hope remains untarnished.”

    Character 1: “Fate may weave its threads, but our choices carve the tale.”

    Character 2: “In the dance of blades, we’ll find the symphony of our destinies.”

    Pretty much nailed any kingdom hearts game


  • But we do though. Maybe not exactly test every possible scenario. Typically when we make a design decision we plan for the worst theoretical condition the part will be exposed to. Then we plan for 5-10 times that. Think about the cost and effort added to everything with that level scrutiny. We design for fringe cases. That’s the point I’m trying to make. It’s insane to me that because it’s software, companies get a free pass on that level of scrutiny. As software takes over more car functions that becomes more concerning. It’s bullshit that I’m part of their beta test.



  • The thing that kills me about this sort of thing is the complete lack of accountability. Working class people at assembly plants, dealers, suppliers will all feel the sting from the drop in sales. There’s some dipshit MBA at GM who made and pushed this decision. Any rational person could see that GM is not is a position to push their own infotainment system. Car play and android auto are beloved. Not having one or both is a deal breaker for new car purchasers. We will never know who this person is. Making such an outrageously bad business decision should result thing this person being blackballed from any kind of business role. But that will never happen.