• 0 Posts
  • 41 Comments
Joined 1 month ago
cake
Cake day: February 16th, 2026

help-circle
  • The significance of Jesus is the movement he spawned. I’m not talking about the Catholic church as it was codified by the Romans a few centuries after his death, but about the movement of Jesus which spread far and wide directly after he died. This movement flourished not by the blade and the authority of oppressive regimes, but because it simply spoke deeply to people, especially the poor and disenfranchised. This kind of thing only happened a handful of times during history.

    He was important because he created a blueprint for resistance of the oppressed, in a time where such resistance was a very hard sell because it went so contrary to the norms and cultures.


  • I think a good pointer when you want to approach religion from a sane perspective is to treat it as primitive tech. For example, modern people know that you need to separate science from politics from law from history from psychology etc… and have a different system for each. But pre-modern people didn’t necessarily know that, so religious doctrine had to serve several, sometimes incompatible purposes. You look at it and it’s like a shovel that has a hammer on it and part of the hammer can be used as a screwdriver. It makes no sense but at the same time it kinda does and it sure has dug a lot of holes and tightened a lot of screws over millennia.



  • I think where it breaks down is that even 1 coin a day is already insanely high for medieval times. A modest person would earn maybe 10 coins a year, if they are somewhat qualified or really good at what they do. And that’s only for people living in cities.

    For most people, living in the countryside, they would see very little currency. You’d mostly own what you could build, grow, raise or barter, and you’d rarely have enough surplus that you could sell for coin. To get 1 gold coin you’d have to sell 2 or 3 sheep but how often would a modest person have animals they don’t absolutely need to keep ? Not something that’s going to happen every year.

    Even the innkeeper would not see 365 gold coins a year, that kind of revenue would be way upper class.







  • Oh man believe me I’m all for it. I totally understand having an approach of engineering that is not bankable or tailored for Californian degen culture.

    I’m not saying there’s anything wrong with your stance. Just saying it will become an aesthetic niche just like there’s some people who still track music on magnetic tape when it would be exponentially faster to use cubase.

    I don’t have your specific axe to grind against AI but my personal angle is to only use old hardware and make software that runs on it.

    Not everything has to be superlative, and self imposed constraints are great for quality of life.




  • Zos_Kia@jlai.lutoSelfhosted@lemmy.worldSelf-Host Weekly (13 March 2026)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    16 days ago

    I think disclosure is good and should be tackled as soon as possible because being transparent in your communication is just good practice in general.

    However I feel like this will soon be rendered useless as all projects will move to agentic (or otherwise ai-assisted) coding.

    Maybe there’ll be a movement of hand coded FOSS but realistically they’ll have a hard time. Resources are already tight for most projects, and rejecting productivity in favor of aesthetics is a rich guy’s strategy.