And that’s why the world is rapidly going to hell. Everyone is under attack and almost no one is willing to so much as lift a finger in resistance.
- 0 Posts
- 24 Comments
argv_minus_one@beehaw.orgto Technology@lemmy.ml•GitHub to require 2FA on accounts by October 6, 202301·2 years agoHow will I notice when the spare fails, if it’s only a spare and I don’t regularly use it? Then I’m down to only one key, and as any grumpy backup admin will tell you, if you have only one copy of something, you have zero copies.
I would have a key plugged into the computer pretty much all the time when I’m working, so anyone who compromises the computer can impersonate me as long as I’m at work. This would be mildly inconvenient to the attacker, but wouldn’t actually stop the attacker. And if the computer isn’t compromised, how is anyone going to get into my GitHub account even without 2FA? They certainly aren’t going to do it by guessing my 16-character generated password or Ed25519 SSH key.
Something-I-know is worthless for authentication in the age of GPU password cracking. Most humans, including myself, do not have photographic memories with which to memorize cryptographically secure passwords. We’re all using password managers for a reason, and a password database is something you have, not something you know.
argv_minus_one@beehaw.orgto Technology@lemmy.ml•GitHub to require 2FA on accounts by October 6, 20230·2 years agoAllowing a smartphone access to anything sensitive is even worse advice. Smartphones are notoriously insecure.
argv_minus_one@beehaw.orgto Technology@lemmy.ml•GitHub to require 2FA on accounts by October 6, 20230·2 years agoHardware tokens are specifically designed to resist copying. Any means of copying it would be considered a security vulnerability.
Bits rot. A hardware token kept in a bank vault may or may not still work when I need it 10 years later, and there is no reasonable process for regularly verifying the integrity of its contents. Backup drives’ checksums are verified with every backup cycle, and so are the checksums on the file system being backed up (I’m using btrfs for that reason).
Hardware tokens are expensive. Mechanical lock keys are not.
argv_minus_one@beehaw.orgto Technology@lemmy.ml•GitHub to require 2FA on accounts by October 6, 20230·2 years agoI personally am afraid of this. What if something gets botched? I’ll be permanently locked out of my account!
argv_minus_one@beehaw.orgto Technology@lemmy.ml•GitHub to require 2FA on accounts by October 6, 20230·2 years agoI dislike MFA because it creates a risk of losing access to my account. I can back up my passwords; I can’t back up a hardware device.
argv_minus_one@beehaw.orgto Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•What is a hobby you enjoy, but seems too quirky or obscure to bring up in most conversations?0·2 years agoThis right here is why electronic locks could be way more secure than mechanical ones, if only their manufacturers would hire well-trained programmers and not boot camp graduates to write the firmware.
Since when were Boston Dynamics robots sentient?
Linux is already dominant on just about everything except the desktop, and it has yet to suffer significant enshittification.
Edit: Well, a bunch of Linux distributions have suffered enshittification, if that counts.
Linux: “We’re dropping support for this device because we’re fairly sure we had the last one in existence and it just died.”
argv_minus_one@beehaw.orgto Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•What's some really unpopular opinion you have?English1·2 years agoEnvironmentalists do not have a snowball’s chance in hell of outbreeding the “drill, baby, drill” crowd.
argv_minus_one@beehaw.orgto Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•Which proprietary software do you prefer over their open-source alternatives, and why?1·2 years agoI agree, love the intervonnectivity with iOS, especially AirDrop.
To me, that sort of “feature” is nothing more than a security vulnerability waiting to be exploited.
Maybe I just think that because of past trauma from Microsoft products and IoT devices being blatantly insecure, but…
argv_minus_one@beehaw.orgto Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•What's some really unpopular opinion you have?01·2 years agoBut I’d be lying if I said my initial impression was anything except “God, what a lazy, fat fuck.”
Sounds like envy. Working out is painful and exhausting, you aren’t allowed to eat tasty things except on extremely rare occasions, and that “lazy fat fuck” has neither of those problems.
argv_minus_one@beehaw.orgto Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•What's some really unpopular opinion you have?English2·2 years agoAnd their response to LGBT+ issues, and their response to Trump’s crimes, and…
Yeah, no. Republicans have had more than enough opportunities to redeem themselves. There is no remaining doubt to give them the benefit of.
argv_minus_one@beehaw.orgto Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•What's some really unpopular opinion you have?English1·2 years agoIf I were to choose to have kids despite climate change, doesn’t that prove that I don’t care about climate change?
argv_minus_one@beehaw.orgto Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•What's some really unpopular opinion you have?English4·2 years agoCryptocurrency is a scam. Not just certain coins, but the whole concept. It’s nothing more than digital tulips.
JavaScript is a bad language, but what’s really bad about it is not the language itself but the ecosystem of libraries and tools. Getting just about anything to work is a huge struggle. Rust is much easier to use.
Having children is a horrible idea.
argv_minus_one@beehaw.orgto Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•Why do most browser companies opt for a Chromium/Blink base instead of a Firefox/Gecko one?2·2 years agoThe only time I ever had memory problems with Firefox was when I tried to run it on a potato. That complaint has always been bullshit.
Edit to add: The aforementioned incident was in 2010, on a machine with only 512MB of RAM. Like I said, potato. Chrome back then was somewhat more memory-efficient than Firefox, and could support three open tabs on that machine before it started thrashing, whereas Firefox would thrash with just one. Both browsers performed abysmally under such a severe RAM shortage, but Chrome was slightly less abysmal. Slightly. I seriously doubt the current version of either browser would be usable on that machine, although I don’t have it (I gave it away soon after this incident) so I can’t check.
I installed all three.
OpenBoard has no swiping support at all.
AnySoftKeyboard is glitchy, moving the cursor around unexpectedly and inserting spurious characters.
FlorisBoard’s swiping is very inaccurate, to the point that it’s barely faster than typing characters one-by-one.
I hope this situation improves soon…
The EU Cyber Resilience Act will effectively make open-source software illegal, and that sure as hell isn’t pro-consumer. Neither is all the spooky surveillance and crippled cryptography they keep trying to mandate.
Dynamic typing is insane. You have to keep track of the type of absolutely everything, in your head. It’s like the assembly of type systems, except it makes your program slower instead of faster.