Halley is the one who predicted its return mathematically. I’d say that’s more significant than seeing it twice in one lifetime and supposing that it’s the same comet.

Homer, give him what he wants!

No, it’s “re” like the subject of an email. “Re: diculous”

The cars belong to commuters whose car use would be reflected in their home county instead of SF.

30 years ago my music teacher told me that in Chinese-language singing it’s the consonants that are sustained.

The modlog says for being a bot.

The problem is that you’re using Windows 95.

He’s got a board with a nail in it!

You are fully licensed and bonded by the city, aren’t you?

Looks like compatibility hacks for various websites.

Interventions - are deeper modifications to make sites compatible. Firefox may modify certain code used on these sites to enforce compatibility. Each compatibility modification links to the bug on Bugzilla@Mozilla; click on the link to look up information about the underlying issue.

User Agent Override - change the user agent of Firefox when connections to certain sites are made.

https://wiki.mozilla.org/Compatibility/UA_Override_&_Interventions_Testing

trekkies in their 40s for some reason. Pc technical, can use a pc well enough to understand above the basic concepts of the best buy laptop the general public use.

I feel attacked, yet also acknowledged.

If social media companies exist to collect massive troves of personal info from users–and they do–then there is a valid national security concern over social media controlled by an adversary. This is distinct from the individual privacy concerns towards domestically-controlled social media.

Oh, here you go. I believe that’s all in order.

Urge to kill falling… falling… RISING! …falling… gone.

How is babby formed?

Mmm-bop

It’s not that it’s an inconvenience, it’s that it seems wrong. Like we’re brainwashing children into venerating the state.

Be, is, are, was, am, were, being, been… are all the same word.

When in Vegas sell light bulbs.

The TOS doesn’t say anything about crimes like murder, and of course you can’t waive that anyway.

What it does say is that any disputes arising out of the use of their website are subject to arbitration. If the plaintiff is correct and Disney is liable because they posted the menu on their website, then that would be a dispute arising out of the use of their website.