![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://programming.dev/pictrs/image/028151d2-3692-416d-a8eb-9d3d4cc18b41.png)
That sounds awful. And a major loss to accessibility. Here’s hoping one of the standards gains traction as the one path everyone can agree on.
That sounds awful. And a major loss to accessibility. Here’s hoping one of the standards gains traction as the one path everyone can agree on.
I’m not up to speed on this issue, but it seems like the solution is to push forward with making the readers work in Wayland? Is there a technical issue with Wayland’s design that prevents readers from working properly?
Maybe the fact you have to be there and read it while connected is the secret sauce to prove that it’s a “real” library, meaning they have a fixed number of copies (max players connected to the server at any given time) and that helps them get protected the same way a real library is?
That sounds awful. We shouldn’t support that kind of invasive tech for any reason.
That’s perfectly fine for some things, but for most people letting their browser choice dictate what sites they use is backwards
Seems more like it’s own top level discussion than related to the 1985 song. But carry on, who am I to rain on your parade?
Not sure I follow. I would definitely enjoy a return to user serviceable devices, including a removable battery compartment. The phones that offer these capabilities are few and far between and often involve unacceptable tradeoffs on other features.
Is there a community for lost lemmings?
Agree on the wallet front. It’s good cases are available for folks that want them, I just see a lot of folks with cases and broken phones anyway, so for me it feels like a false sense of security.
It’s a risk. 🤷♂️ I prefer to be self insured and manage my own risk.
I see plenty of folks with cases running around with cracked screens, so it’s not a guaranteed safe approach.
We’re a rare breed it seems. I don’t like the extra bulk and I paid for a high end phone I don’t want to feel a $20 case.
infosec.pub - user instance checks out. And I’m with you, it’s awful for privacy. I’ll keep using the plastic card.
It’s ok to think recall is invasive and bad for privacy, but it isn’t even released yet. If you’re gonna hate something and drag it through the mud, do it for real and valid reasons.
Yeah. Just warning for those that didn’t watch it, starting off on the pig one thinking you’re gonna see the advertisement one could be a rude switch.
Definitely black mirror, but pretty sure it is not episode one.
I don’t think we should have to accept toxic behavior or content on facilitate discussions.
Perhaps the problem is that many folks are quick to label anything they don’t immediately understand or agree with as toxic, and if that’s what you mean I agree we need less of that.
I’m in agreement with you, cause even with the eye/brain processing time, you still have the time for light to reflect off whatever you’re seeing and hit your eyes. So there’s definitely some delays.
I think the interesting part for me, is when the orders of magnitude make a difference on the human scale
The few milliseconds it takes light to reflect and my brain to process it is not really tangible, but knowing that this nova in OP occurred thousands of years ago and is just reaching out eyes now is worth noting, IMO.
This has always confused me, but reference frames makes conceptual sense to me.
Even still, I like to think about how long ago what I’m seeing now actually occurred.
For example when we see a planet in our solar system in the sky we know it’s still technically in the past, but it’s still in timescales humans can relate to.
Not quite. Most literally couldn’t survive without a car, due to the infrastructure of the city/town they live in. They are a necessity for the vast majority of folks.
Former kbiner, but out of the loop on this one. What’s I miss?