• 1 Post
  • 382 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 21st, 2023

help-circle





  • When I entered the workforce in the late '90s, people were still saying this about putting PCs on every employee’s desk. This was at a really profitable company. The argument was they already had telephones, pen and paper. If someone needed to write something down, they had secretaries for that who had typewriters. They had dictating machines. And Xerox machines.

    And the truth was, most of the higher level employees were surely still more profitable on the phone with a client than they were sitting there pecking away at a keyboard.

    Then, just a handful of years later, not only would the company have been toast had it not pushed ahead, but was also deploying BlackBerry devices with email, deploying laptops with remote access capabilities to most staff, and handheld PDAs (Palm pilots) to many others.

    Looking at the history of all of this, sometimes we don’t know what exactly will happen with newish tech, or exactly how it will be used. But it’s true that the companies that don’t keep up often fall hopelessly behind.










  • nucleative@lemmy.worldtoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.worldfully autonomous
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I can see why it’s a spicy headline but we should appreciate a human override capability.

    Hopefully waymo is forced into transparency about this. Transparency 100% fully clear on when the tech runs into a variety of situations including humans intervening.

    That should be a mandatory for them to have the licensing necessary to operate autonomous vehicles anywhere in public spaces.

    After all, they are learning on the public’s dime and at the public’s risk. We have to know if it’s truly better and what kind of new risks are created that weren’t otherwise anticipated.






  • nucleative@lemmy.worldtoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.worldeveryone hates AI
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    People around me use AI all the time to get answers to generalized topics. More and more they use it like a search engine / information augmentation system.

    They are not technical people. They mostly know that the information needs to be double checked and might be wrong. But usually take it at face value if the importance is low.

    Honestly this is about what they did before. They would search Google, click on the first blog, skim it, and repeat until getting some answer they believe.

    I too use AI regularly for brainstorming, quickly summarizing massive text messages, and reformatting text from a jumbled mess into something more cohesive, etc.

    I don’t love it or hate it. In some cases it saves a lot of time and is useful tool. In other cases it outputs trash that we cannot use for any serious case.

    Just like a hammer or a shovel, it’s a tool. Can be used the right way and it can be used the wrong way.