*effectation

I’m curious what you work as? Sysadmin?

I thought “bricked up” means having a hard on.

That was well done

You can view some profiles (authwall for others) and some show all content (tried it out with bbc and forbes), others drop relatively recent content while some others only show ancient content from a year or more ago.

The latter two were when I tried opening the twitter pages for some smaller podcasts I follow.

The flag in your username made me pause. On some other social media it meant hindu nationalist, love that here it means you like NetBSD lol.

Gnucap read “no cap”

Hope you get well

I’m guessing you misread the post. If not, how do digestive problems affect peeing?

There are models that have only used data with permissive licenses.

Doubt it. People would still post revenge porn, unconsensually filmed stuff or leak e.g nudes that were meant for each other and not the public. Because the motivation there is not money, it would be to humiliate, for example.

It seems people in the comments here missed the “with wives” part. Generally speaking, your wife is not going to be terribly pleased with you ogling or getting off to other women. And violating that is what makes these men count as weird.

Well here’s someone putting unnecessary math into their sex scene:

Said communities would rather indirectly “house” them in tax-funded prisons? I’d point them to studies on how incarcerating and enforcing these laws end up costing Americans more than it does to house people, such as this: https://homelessvoice.org/the-cost-to-criminalize-homelessness/

What a strange state of affairs. People may not live outdoors because that looks unsightly. But you will also not give them a place to go.

Hope there are enough homeless shelters for them to move into. Otherwise you would be suggesting the inconvenience you face from having to see them sleep in the streets justifies making it impossible for them to in their desperate situation have even that.

Its under a subsection on “modesty”. But I don’t know why it’s under the section on prayer.

They are general rules on clothing, you can look up “awra for women” to get at the same stuff.

The meme is meant to get something similar across. The people who ask questions like that somehow seem to expect all the suffering people there are going through to be ignored or something.

No, it is obligatory according to the major schools of law in Islam, which the manority follow.

Here’s the section from Encyclopedia of Islamic law: a compendium of the views of the major schools by Laleh Bakhtiar (archive: https://archive.org/details/encyclopediaofis0000bakh/page/70/mode/2up )

While its true there are outliers like fundamentalists who go to extremes and progressives who deny many rules, there are four major schools in (Sunni) Islamic law that the majority of people follow and they all take at the very least the ruling that the covering for women is everything except her face, hands and feet - when among men who she legally can marry (“mahram”).

deleted by creator