• underwire212@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    “My prehistoric brain can only think in ‘binary’ and doesn’t understand that development of a successful threat model doesn’t (and often can’t) be perfect, but any incremental change to my behavior and online practices in a way to prevent sensitive information from being shared and potentially utilized by malicious actors is a plus.

    Instead of thinking about all of that, I’m going to reduce the whole subject to a nice and neat logical fallacy of ‘online privacy is terrible nowadays, thus it doesn’t matter what I do’ “

  • Badland9085@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    There’s worse.

    They already know everything about me anyways. If I can exchange my data for some free and easy to use service, I’m more than happy to give.

    I hate defeatism.

    • Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 minutes ago

      I don’t, in general make this same bargain, and I’m not more than happy to give my data, and thus sacrifice my privacy. However, I have had to reckon, and I think many of those who value privacy must too, with the fact that it isn’t inherently valued by everyone, that simply adequately communicating this in a way that’s better understood won’t translate to people suddenly realising what they’re giving up. We aren’t always simply one great analogy away from changing every person’s world view and likely many have come to their view from a place at least as well informed as those of us who jealously guard our privacy. I also have to reckon with the fact that to some extent, my own desire to protect my privacy is at least not fully explainable by logic and rationalism, especially in light of how difficult it is to protect and how easy it is to have unwittingly ceded it. You might call that defeatism, and to simply conclude “well I lost some privacy, so I might as well give it up completely” is accepting defeat, again not something I’m yet prepared to do, but it is also perhaps important to acknowledge and factor present realities in to one’s thinking. It might sound defeatist to point out an enemy’s big guns pointed toward you from all sides, but it’s insane to ignore them. That quote that you’ve produced, while antithetical to my thinking, really isn’t irrational or illogical, and only defeatist if you were onboard with fighting to begin with. If you do not value your privacy and you get something useful in exchange for its sacrifice then it would seem obvious to part with it gladly and it’s difficult to offer a rational reason why someone shouldn’t. My strongest motivation for protecting it is more idealistic than personal and has more to do with a kind of slippery slope argument and a concern for hypothetical power grabbing and eroding of our rights and autonomy. I like to think that’s reason enough, but at least right now, for almost everyone, none of those concerns represent clear nor present dangers and I can’t prove it definitely will become such in future though I certainly feel like it has accelerated trends firmly in the direction of my fears.

    • Tangentism@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Its not even defeatism, its willingly sacrificing themselves to the machine in hopes it will be merciful!

      • Badland9085@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        16 hours ago

        True.

        And they’ll follow that up with a somewhat snarky comment that “You’ll be eliminated by the machines first.”

  • AAA@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    The claim to have “nothing to hide” was not just born our of ignorance, but also out of comfort - to not having to do anything about it.

    Now that even the last one accepted that they do indeed have something to hide, but in order to justify their own inaction, it’s labeled as inevitable: privacy is not real.

    They are lying to themselves, because doing otherwise would mean they have to admit being wrong.

    • Manalith@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      The ‘nothing to hide’ argument seems a lot like that ‘first they came for socialists and I did not speak out, because I was not a socialist…’ quote. Sure you have nothing to hide right now, but what happens when something you weren’t hiding becomes a target.

    • 🦇 Batman 🦇@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      i think its a propganda to destroy privacy like the one “police are public protector” only the high ups and they know what police means but the general public dont .

  • kekmacska@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    “i don’t have anything to hide” mfs when their passwords get leaked:

  • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    “chrome was hogging up my ram” is the dumbest part of all of this lmao, this person’s decisionmaking is completely driven by placebo and it’s hilarious

    • Tangentism@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      16 hours ago

      If it wasnt beaten by this, it comes a very close 2nd: “Firefox is trash at loading HTML websites”.

      You can tell that fucker spends their time gibbering techno waffle bollcoks to old people!

    • Alice@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Bro’s from the timeline where Flash became the dominant species.

        • kekmacska@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          PHP: Facebook, Dream Market, Silk Road(darkweb)

          Ruby on Rails: Github, Airbnb

          Django: Bitbucket

          These technologies can compile into websites in themselves, but they are usually used as backend

  • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I use Edge on my work laptop because:

    • Vertical Tabs
    • Logs into my SSO account
    • Leaks info from my computer like a sieve (it’s my employer’s info, and they don’t deserve privacy)
  • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I mean, yeah, privacy isn’t really a thing in our digital surveillance age. Doesn’t mean I’m not gonna make it as hard as possible for them. Make em work for it.

  • Daniel@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I don’t think I’ve had an issue on Firefox other than some sites saying “unsupported browser,” which is really the site’s fault.

  • edric@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    When they realized they DO actually have something to hide, they moved the goalposts to now say nothing is private online anyway.