• NotSteve_@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    To be fair, I do think it’s a bit different than a coup. If strong evidence comes out that the election was tampered with (which I could believe) then I’d call it a coup, but as it stands right now, it’s more like the American people voted to try a dictatorship political system out

    Coup implies hostile takeover but Musk & Co. were just handed the reins to the US government

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Oh, we’re playing the literalist game. I didn’t realize. Yes, if a coup requires a violent overthrow, then that may not have happened.

      I would think that modern coup definition could be extended to include tricking a large number of people through media brainwashing. I guess it depends on your minimum definition of violence. Is brain washing a violent act?

    • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The executive branch is taking power from the legislative and judicial branch. By taking the power of the purse and by ignoring judicial orders.

      The executive branch is executing a coup. Like by definition. No one voted to throw out the constitution. We voted for a president that had checks and balances. Now that they are in, they are ignoring the checks and consolidating power.

      • NotSteve_@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Right, yeah I can agree when it’s put that way. It’s definitely an interesting situation to say the least