It was a strong year for Best Animated Feature Oscar nominations, and an underdog triumphed. At the 97th annual Academy Awards at Ovation Hollywood in Los Angeles last night, Flow beat competition from Pixar’s Inside Out 2, DreamWorks’ The Wild Robot and Aardman’s Wallace & Gromit: Vengeance Most Fowl.

Gints Zilbalodis tale about a cat in a flooded world missed out on the Oscar for Best International Feature Film but still became Latvia’s first Oscar win. And it was surely also the first Oscar winner to be made entirely in the free 3D modelling software Blender, cementing the open-source program’s place among the best animation software.

Flow was one of our highlights of Annecy 2024, and it still seems incredible that it was made by a small team using Blender alone. It was rendered in EEVEE, Blender’s realtime render engine.

Gints thanked Blender when accepting the award. Speaking to press afterwards, he said: "Any kid now has tools that are used to make now Academy Award-winning films, so I think we’re going to see all kinds of exciting films being made from kids who might not have had a chance to do this before.

    • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      92
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      Whenever I download a new version of Blender I typically throw them $10 - $15.

      Just like with other open source software I use, I give it a shot and if I like it I’ll throw them $10 - $15 each time I update.

      Edit: It’s not much but it’s not nothing. No raindrop feels reasonable for the flood and all that.

    • Dil@is.hardlywork.ing
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      I didn’t hear they’re struggling? Its not like they can get more money and instantly increase the scope and just toss stuff on, people compare them to for profit companies who need to make a profit for investors, the amount of money they have would obv be less

      Like they wont shut down anytime soon, but more miney will definitely lead to more features. Personally want to see simulation improvements, its just so poor compared to embergen/houdini.

  • jws_shadotak@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    The movie was really well done. It’s a simpler animation style so don’t expect Pixar level stuff, but the story and art direction are great.

    • commander@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      I just saw the trailer and thought it looked good.

      Pixar has conditioned us to only value a certain kind of 3D animation that is very round and lanky, similar to Popeye. It’s animation that exists to make things as easy as possible for the animators. Same thing with the calarts bean face. They don’t care about creativity or art. They only care about making money as reliably and easily as possible.

    • Venator@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      I thought it was a game when I first saw the trailer and was mildly disappointed to find out it’s a movie 😅, still looking forward to watching it some time though.

  • stochastictrebuchet@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    10 days ago

    Well-deserved win! Watched this in the cinema a few weeks back. What immediately struck me about the beautiful art style is that it felt more like what you’d expect from a labor-of-love indie game than from a dreamworks/pixar studio – and it was incredibly refreshing! Also, for a movie where water plays a big role, the fluid rendering was absolutely breathtaking. I could almost smell the warm plastic air of a GPU giving its all.

    • Darren@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      it felt more like what you’d expect from a labor-of-love indie game

      I thought that too. It was like a long cutscene and I loved it.

    • directive0@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 days ago

      Hahaha yeah same, was not expecting it to get on top of them so easily.

      I feel like young kids these days are desensitized to scary imagery (ghosts and ghouls and blood and guts) but take jeopardy or peril really hard.

  • hera@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 days ago

    Incredible to see how far blender has come. I remember using it over ten years when I was trying to get off pirated software (3ds max), while it’s still recognisable the capability has exploded

    • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      It is available to stream on Max, which means that if you do not have the means to legally stream it there, you’ll be able to find it on the high seas. That said, if you do opt to watch it through “alternative means”, make sure to at least send a little money Blender’s way.

      https://fund.blender.org/

  • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 days ago

    I’m excited to check this out. My tastes rarely align with those of the Academy, but this looks like it could be a really beautiful film and these kind of efforts deserve support.

    • potustheplant@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      It’s a very simple film without much depth to be honest. Memoir of a snail was far better.

      • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        without much depth

        How much “depth” do you expect to get out a group of animals acting “mostly” natural and without a single line of human dialog? With those limitations, I think it excelled. There were even a couple tearjerker moments, for me at least.

        • potustheplant@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          Not having dialogue has nothing to do with. While the animals can only be so complex (if acting “naturally”), the storytelling is not limited to just that. They could’ve probably told more about the world with the elements and places the animals found. The animation was pretty crappy at some points too. The dog for example was not very well done.

          Regardless of all of this, I’m not saying it should have been different, I only wanted to express that this movie is not worthy of an oscar when compared to something like Memoir Of A Snail, imo.

  • bedeviled@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 days ago

    Family liked it, especially the kids, but the ending was like, wait what? It’s over?

    • BalderSion@real.lemmy.fan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      I realized part way through the title works on a few levels. It was refreshing to realize this wasn’t remotely following the 3-act narrative structure and I had no idea what was happening next.

    • crimsonpoodle@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      The poor whale x.x. I throught for sure the cat was going to climb the mountain and see the elk herd circling like in their dream.

  • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 days ago

    But the thumbnail, isn’t that just the album cover from Nirvana’s Nevermind?