• jinarched@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      I agree.To me art is an expression of the soul; it’s an expression of one’s perception of the world. It has spiritual qualities (in an atheist sense). There is an inner world that puts out together a piece of art that LLMs do not possess and that’s why they need to train on existing material that comes from human expression.

      I highly doubt an LLM suffers, loves, hopes, hates and cries like us. Art is an expression of who we are individualy and collectively. LLMs only hallucinate with art made by humans. While we humans can find inspiration from other artists, it is not a necessity to train on vast databases of art pieces to put something together. They say that while it’s hard to define what art is, you know it when you see it. To me when I get that feeling from something made by AI, all I really see is a piece of an other artist’s soul trapped in some sort of simulacrum put together by an algorithm.

      Cut the training material and AI “art” will stagnate. We, on the other hand, won’t.

      That’s why I think AI art will never really be art… unless if one day they somehow develop a “soul” themselves and start to express an inner world of their own.

      • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        unless if one day they somehow develop a “soul” themselves and start to express an inner world of their own.

        Gaius Baltar enters the chat.

    • Ænima@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I tend to agree with that. I also hate that of all the great uses for generative AI, this is the direction they took the tech. It’s not a replacement for whole jobs, and I knew that at the onset, but so many dumb business types thought it could replace entire departments, customer service, etc.

    • TheDorkfromYork@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      AI generation is a gradient from clean up to controlling every pixel.

      If an artist draws the line art, does basic coloring, but has a network do the sharing, that’s art. How far does that carry?

      Surely, anything that had heart and soul poured into it is art, right? Text prompt, or otherwise. You don’t have to resonate with it. You can be scared of it.

      But you said imagination, feeling, skill make up art. It is bold, or naive, to think those who create AI works doesn’t have these traits, like to say the hobbies, programmers, and the curious, aren’t artists.

    • occultist8128@infosec.pubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      to be honest, i’m not only referring to images. any kind of what so called “art” since it’s possible now to make “music” with AI. thanks for the response anyway.

    • uranibaba@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      5 days ago

      Even if the image was regenerated with tweaked prompts until the generated image expressed what the prompter wanted to convey?

      • Valmond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        I don’t think we’re at the level AI prompting can be used to reflect the subtlety needed to make art. It’s like chainsaw art, cool and mebbe art but it’s not art like the old masters art.

        Also everyone thinking that shitting out a Rembrandt liking image is fantastic does not understand what art really is.

      • Squorlple@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        The person inputting prompt modifications may have controlled the larger assets as a whole, but they did not curate the Gestalt of the image. If the input is text that a computer is to output as a literal estimation, then it is data, not art; if the input is data curated by a person who means for a computer to output it as plotted data, such as with a complex lineplot or 3D model or even text as ASCII images, then that can be art.

      • Yes even then. Writing a prompt is no more an artistic skill than describing your idea to an artist you’re commissioning. You didn’t create a damn thing. You will not be called an artist for commissioning a work.

        • Uranium 🟩@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          5 days ago

          But would that then imply that all commissioned works aren’t art?

          Or does the difference of who (or more specifically what) you commission to produce something decide whether it’s art?