• Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Lemmy is aimed at pleasing all of humanity.

    Asking for a women-centric flavor of any site is parallel to asking for a version with less men. If you’re implying there is a difference to the interests of both, I’d love to show you the Grey’s Anatomy sub.

    • misteloct@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      Neigh, Lemmy is aimed at pleasing all the world.

      I am species blind. Asking for a species-centric flavor of any site is parallel to asking for a version with less horses. If you’re implying there is a difference to the interests of both, I’d love to show you equestrian sports.

      There is literally nothing different between any species, gender, or even a rock. Women, Men. Heck 1 + 1 = 3. Everything is exactly the same. It’s a soup of protons. It’s all the same!

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I think there are differences in the interests of both. Can you explain your argument here, without super obscure references?

      • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        7 days ago

        We just shouldn’t consider either gender’s interests as stereotypes. Also, if a community becomes one or the other “centric”, then on some level, it’s exclusionary.