• KaRunChiy@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      1 day ago

      People are too wussy to use waterfox or at least firefox. Just gotta have a chrome variant I guess

        • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          ·
          1 day ago

          That is mostly but not entirely true, Firefox has a few variants of its own, alternatives do exist.

          I did some research into the topic not long ago, you basically want to choose an engine and from that a browser

          Gecko basd (Firefox)

          • librewolf
          • gnu icecat
          • tor browser
          • mullvad
          • zen browser

          Goanna based (Fork of Gecko)

          • Pale moon
          • Basilisk

          Servo based (very early in development/not for daily use)

          • servo browser
          • verso browser
          • flow browser

          Ladybird: fully independent engine and browser

          • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 day ago

            Also waterfox. Can’t forget about waterfox. That said, I’m daily driving Zen at this point and am extremely happy with it

            • Septimaeus@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              12 hours ago

              Also for completion of the taxonomical reference above, Safari GNOME Web and Konqueror use the actual WebKit rendering engine that branched from KDE Plasma in 2001.

              Chrome, Edge, and all the Chromium-based browsers use “Blink,” which branched from the WebKit project in 2013 and evolved separately. It’s different enough now to be considered distinct (developers supporting these browsers need no reminder) but a portion of the original properties are still shared.

              Most of the time when people say “webkit” they’re referring to Google’s Blink engine, but the original WebKit project is still around and lives on in a handful of evergreen browsers that bear mention.

        • matchaotter@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          17 hours ago

          My job basically requires that I use Chrome (I work for a SaaS company whose product’s advance features only work on Chromium). Vivaldi has, at least so far, performed the best, offered the most customization that suited my needs, and isn’t Chrome/Edge. I liked Arc as well, but it has the same issues that Vivaldi has.

          I don’t like Brave due to its push of AI/crypto, and Opera doesn’t really work with some of our internal apps.

          As a decades long Firefox user it sucks, but I don’t have much of a choice when it comes to work. It’s tough finding alternatives built on Chromium that accomplish everything I need without there being some major caveat.

          • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            33
            ·
            1 day ago

            sure. i also dislike that it’s a closed source product created by a private company that could rug pull all the users to turn a quick buck at any time. they haven’t in the last 10 years, and come from a legacy of a company that was very respectful of their customers (opera) but you could also argue the legacy of opera being bought by a spyware company was the last rugpull and that vivaldi will inevitably do the same. but that’s a more abstract complaint