• Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    On the plus side, somebody’s been working on getting Linux to run on a Commodore-64. So I’m pretty sure the 486 won’t be left behind for long.

    • LeFantome@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I think you are good on your mail server for a while.

      Linux kernel 6.15 will still boot on a 486. You can pair that with MUSL 1.25 (current) and the latest Busybox to create a perfectly viable Linux system.

      Debian Trixie is going to be released in a couple months with kernel 6.12 LTS.

      As somebody pointed out in a different post, the Linux Foundation will provide support for kernel 6.12 for 10 years after Debian Trixie is released.

      https://www.cip-project.org/about/linux-kernel-core-packages

      So, there will be a supported kernel that can be compiled for the 486 until mid 2035 at least.

      • LeFantome@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I know this is all just in fun but a mail server is one thing I would certainly want a supported kernel on. Security and email are not friends.

  • gsv@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 days ago

    Tbh, I understand the problem. There are just so many volunteers for making newer developments work on every platform. Streamlining the development and easing the load on the volunteer devs seems a good idea. Having that said, it’s ofc a pity to drop support for devices. At least the LTS kernels will support the current support for a while and the vibrant Linux community will find a good way to work it out, I have no doubt. Many machines, in particular old ones, run with very old kernels to begin with…

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    Just as the MiSTer has started putting (sorta) 486s back in people’s hands, although if the newly required instructions aren’t too complicated, I suppose someone could conceivably add them to the core.

    I guess one unknown for me is how the capability detection of the kernel works and if it works on instruction detection or if it determines it via CPUID.

    A big also is that I’ve not yet tried to run Linux on mine yet so I’m not even sure it’s possible with a modern kernel anyway. I think I remember seeing someone got an old version of redhat or Debian working

    • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I’ve seen a whole raft of 386 machines on AliExpress recently. I need to investigate what’s actually in them .

      Edit: it’s just 386s Edit 2: 386 soc on board

      • 9point6@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 days ago

        Ah I believe those are powered by chips originally intended to be used in industrial control use cases.

        Loads of old manufacturing machines & software out there that are built around a 386/486, and given intel hasn’t exactly been making those models in a good while, some companies stepped up to provide compatible replacements for those situations.

        Someone on AliExpress had the idea of using them in a more pc-like product for retro gaming, and voila we have all these modern 386/486 clones

        • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          Yeah they seem to be M6117 386 soc. They’re a bit pricey to buy on a whim, but I’ll keep an eye out, might be fun to tinker with.