• Goldholz @lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    33 minutes ago

    There was a bit at 3rd grade “difference between boys and girls and where babys come from” (no no sex talk)

    In 5th grade I was absent in hospital but in 5th grade you learn sexual biologie, contraceptions, menstruation, puberty and i think STDs. When i got back from hospital it was mid way into the lessons about female genitalia and tampons so i didnt learn it from school but from books at home. I dont know if they talked about different sexualitys existing, if not this needs to change.

    7th grade has puberty and hormones, genetics, pregnacy and birth.

    I dont know what it was in 9th grade but there defenetly was also something that could fall under 'sex ed".

    It always was open, no shaming and professional

    Germany Bavaria. It is manditory and you cant take your child out of those classes because its part of the regular biologie class

  • hardcoreufo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Maryland early 2000s. We had a real health teacher. It was pretty clinical and factual for the most part. The only thing that really stood out was the teacher telling us that peeing killed any sperm left in the urethra and a kid asking if he could “piss in his woman and not wear a condom.” This poor old teacher has to say “Do not piss in your woman.”

  • m4xie@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Only what was on the biology national exam spec. Lots of hormone cycles of FSH and lutenising hormone, literally nothing outside the cervix.

  • Rose@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I’m in Finland, in my 40s. I don’t remember much. I think in the early teens we did have lessons in school about sex and reproductive biology. What I do remember is the “real” sex education stuff around 15-16 years of age, that was part of the health education classes, because, well, I think it got inadvertently weird. The physical education / health education teacher we had was retiring that year. To no one’s surprise, the stuff in the textbook was left for us to read on our own. Because “ummm I don’t think I need to cover this, uhhh heh heh, ummm, you kids probably already know about this”. And everyone was, like, thank God we were spared of that.

  • TipRing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Middle School (Mississippi): Basically all lies: having sex with a condom will give you AIDS, abortions are evil and most women who get them die of cancer or suicide. Even 6th grade me knew that shit was fucking wrong, but I was already on thin ice in that school for fucking up the curve, thank Homosexual Jesus that I was only there half a year.

    Junior High (New Jersey): Skip ahead to 9th grade. Sex-Ed was taught by a terrified gym teacher who was just adorable. This was pretty comprehensive, lots of biology and factual information. It was the early 90s so a big part of it was teaching how to avoid getting HIV, teaching both abstinence and condoms. Some mention of same-sex relationships, but when asked about the risk of HIV transmission from lesbian sex he blanched and said he didn’t know. No real fault here given the time period. They also taught various forms of birth control and other STIs. There was an undercurrent of promoting abstinence but also some pragmatic realism. In retrospect it could have been better, but compared to most of the country it was very good.

  • MTK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Mostly porn as a kid, then actual research on my own. Sucks that sex ed is so ignored

  • SnarkoPolo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Technical, but no mention of the social, psychological, or emotional aspects of sexuality.

    Female orgasm was literally never discussed or even spoken of. This was in the very conservative city of Anaheim, in very conservative Orange County, California.

  • Salt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    It was pure abstinence only. Our teachers were only allowed to tell us not to have sex, and that was pretty much it. Never even saw a diagram of a vagina or a penis.

  • hitagi@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 day ago

    I remember in elementary school we had a lesson on sex organs. When I turned in my test paper, I curiously asked my teacher, “If the sperm is in the male, and the egg is in the female, how does the sperm transfer over?”

    All she said was, “Well, what do you think?” To which I replied, “I don’t know.” Then I quietly returned to my desk. Later I discussed it with my friend and we concluded that a male must pee into a female. Because at the time, pee was the only thing we knew came out of the penis.

  • stiephelando@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    My parents had bought a book on the subject to read to us kids. I got a hold of it first and read it by myself. When my dad brought me to bed, I “educated” him about where kids come from. It’s still one of my parents’ favorite stories about me as a kid.

    In school, sex ed was alright. They taught us everything we need to know incl. how to prevent STDs and pregnancies. The only thing I would criticize in hindsight is that they used giant test tubes (25cm) to teach us how to put on condoms. That made a lot of boys feel inadequate.

  • 2ugly2live@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    We had some diagrams about the sex organs. And an overview of birth control (IUD, condom, etc.). I had it twice. Once in Middle School, and it was a generic overview at best (mostly “for the love of God, don’t”) and then a more detailed one in high school. I believe they also showed us a woman giving birth.

  • Moonweedbaddegrasse@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    In the UK in the 1970s we were shown cross sections of male and family reproductive organs and copied pages out of a textbook about the essential mechanics. I can’t remember any discussion or moral guidance in the slightest. But then at that point I was well into my ‘hedge porn’ stage so that’s how I really educated myself.

  • jabathekek@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Christian teachers showing us pictures of STI infections that had been left alone for probably years before the patient went to/was able to go to a doctor in an effort to scare us into celibacy. Generally a scarring experience that didn’t really teach us anything other than to practice safe sex.

    *This was in the early 2000s IIRC.

    Reading through the comments I remembered about a really great sex-positive TV show I would always watch late at night at around the same time my public education failed in teaching me about sex. The hosts were a really attractive Asian-looking guy with flowy hair and always wore a silk shirt with the top 2-3 buttons undone and a really attractive white girl that always wore a lot of tight clothes. They went over a lot of topics regarding attraction, safe-sex, how to deal with STIs; however, I don’t think there were any specific segments on anything LGBTQ+, but IIRC they didn’t need to because they way they presented things were easily applied to any sexual orientation. As in they talked about anal sex and how to do it safely and whatnot without specifically saying gex. I would love to read more about it, so if you know what it was called please lmk.

    • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      This plus being forced to watch a video of a woman giving birth for us. Also that birth control methods in general, including condoms, aren’t very reliable. Well, guess what happens when you tell teenagers a condom might not even make a difference in preventing pregnancy…

      Absolutely nothing about consent either, so the nastiest shit was said about a teenager who got pregnant from statutory rape (7+ year age difference). LGBT? Absolutely nothing. I think someone might have said something in one of my classes asking if we were going to cover it, and the (gym coach) teacher making loud disgusted noises while laughing and saying no.

      Christ, the 90s and 00s were not great in a lot of ways.

      • monotremata@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Yeah, I had the same thing with the photos of diseased bodies and the disparaging of contraception. I remember in particular that the textbook chapter on abstinence was immediately followed by the chapter on parenthood, which felt like it left a pretty conspicuous gap.

        Amusingly there were two very different Health Class experiences to be had at my school. You were assigned one at random, you couldn’t choose which teacher you got. One was a first-year math teacher and member of an unsuccessful local Christian rock band. He’s who I had. The other possibility was a lesbian gym teacher, whose class was apparently (and unsurprisingly) a LOT more useful.

        But yeah, the 90’s kinda sucked, and I hate that the US is trundling back towards that kind of “education.”

      • jabathekek@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        All of what you just said made me remember it more clearly, and all of what you just said is pretty much exactly my experience as well. Goddamn christians.

  • Ketram@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    I was raised partially in a Unitarian Universalist church which believes in comprehensive sex education. I was still a dumbass about it but they definitely tried to inform me and I think I have a healthier sex life than most people have had.