• unhrpetby@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    For instance, Discord shouldn’t be a thing since IRC exists, but Discord exists and is very successful.

    IRC lacks a massive amount of features that discord users typically want. Screensharing, VCs with group and camera support, built-in history (don’t need to use a bouncer like on IRC), built-in online GIF searcher and sender with one click, huge community of bots that use discord’s API to do anything from games to moderation.

    It isn’t even close.

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      ICQ and AIM managed to draw a huge crowd in the early (ish) days of home Internet.

      It’s not about features…it’s about ease of use.

      Also, IRC wasn’t as decentralized as email to begin with, there were several isolated networks that would not communicate with each other (dalnet, EFnet, undernet, etc)

      • unhrpetby@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        21 hours ago

        It’s not about features…it’s about ease of use.

        Its absolutely about both features and ease of use. If your program doesn’t do what people want from it, then good luck.

        Its also irrelevant to talk about considering I have used IRC and highly doubt that people are going to consider it easier to use than discord.

        • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Yeah I’m giving the ease-of-use points to Discord.

          I’d agree that both are big, sure…but ICQ and AIM didn’t have attachments or GIFs or screensharing, They barely had text formatting. Yet they were still bigger than the semi-decentralized (but at least standards-based) IRC. The features weren’t the big lure, it was the ease of use.