had a good view at least

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      Not need. Had the partner come down and get me in the truck. This is about 8 miles from where I live. We try and ride it everyday and flats happen all the time.

          • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            Sure, but I’d still argue that the vast majority of flats people get would have been avoided by running tubeless. I’ve fixed around 8 punctures over the past 10,000km and only one of them was such that tire sealant wouldn’t have fixed.

            • 𝕮𝕬𝕭𝕭𝕬𝕲𝕰@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Fair enough - I suppose it’s a caution borne out of experience of the awful roads by me - I’ve had a lot of unsealable punctures on the roads near me (from gashes to a bit of glass that wiggled around just enough to not seal).

              As a result I always caveat advice to go tubeless - for “proper” punctures (anything more serious than a pin prick or snakebite) tubeless can be a can of worms, and give people a sense of confidence that inner tube users don’t have (wisely).

              Granted it’s also down to tyre choice (you can pry my patched panaracers from my cold dead hands) but a tyre pissing sealant and air is much more of a hassle to deal with than an inner tube in my experience.