When you see something has too much up or down votes, does this change your point of view? Also how many people hides votes and etc?

Edit: also is there any eay yo disable scores like 100%😀 in voyager for lemmy?

  • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 days ago

    I don’t care about the rating on other people’s content. On my own I only care so far as to use it as a guideline for whether I actually was interesting.

    On reddit I was a trolling karma whore, but here? Here I’m much more about engaging with people and getting 3 upvotes tells me that I gave the community something meaningful.

  • dullbananas (Joseph Silva)@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    When in comes to my own posts and comments, my trust in vague negative reactions is long gone.

    Some things that made me more suspicious of Lemmy users:

    • Most criticism of one thing was vague and often mentioned my mental health. And the only non-vague comment was targeted at the involved Catholic beliefs/values and my unusual sense of humor.
    • I banned someone for 1 day for saying “So, am I right in assuming that OP has untreated schizophrenia? Wtf is this word vomit?” and someone described this as “banned a guy because he said you write poorly” which is a very weird interpretation. I obviously would not have gived a ban if the comment just said “you write poorly”.

    For me, taking online feedback less seriously was a big part of growing up.

  • Zenith@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    No, not at all. When you get a ton of downvotes but zero responses, assuming you didn’t just post literal nonsense, I consider it proof I’m correct and it’s just a truth people don’t like. When you’re wrong people will downvote you and tell you why, which should be a learning experience that a person should be humble enough to accept but just downvotes or responses only attacking you not you points is pure validation you’re speaking an uncomfortable truth

    • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      And when someone spins up 3 entire instances to create accounts to downvote you, you know you’re right.

  • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I check my downvotes every so often to see if I’ve made an ass of myself.

    --Not safe for Grammar--

    Thankfully, people often explain they’re downvotes here, so I tend to learn something.

    If I haven’t internalized whatever it is, I’ll find that their still downvoting me, so I get another chance to improve there opinion of me.

    Edit: Good point. Warning added.

    • Omega@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      I disagree, downvotes come free but replies are expensive, when downvotes are disabled you instead have replies that debunk you

      You only encourage dogpiling when downvotes are available

  • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    Yes and no. The same comment on different communities can have vastly different results, so I think it’s too easy to just “justify” why the ratios you don’t agree with are there, while the ones you do are obviously “fair”

  • my_hat_stinks@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    Usually no, unless I’ve left a reply disagreeing then someone else comes along and downvotes them, makes me look like an ass who downvotes anyone I disagree with. I also check my own comments to see if people agree with me but I’ll keep the comment up either way, if I do change my mind I’d rather leave a new comment or add stuff in an edit.

    It’s not too difficult to bot votes on lemmy so they’re even more pointless than they are on reddit.

  • FRYD@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    I pretty much always win with votes. If I get upvotes, I think someone appreciated it. If someone downvotes, I think they’re a hater.

    I won’t lie though; my adhd ass checks way too often in a desperate search for dopamine.

  • psud@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    When I see someone downvoted for no good reason, I tend to support them; upvotes don’t sway me at all. My own stuff I see votes as a guide to how well I fit a community (except in one controversial group which attracts down votes – there voters are meaningless

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    I like to say it doesn’t change my view, but it probably does more than I realize. Everyone likes to think they’re immune to stuff like that, but we really aren’t.

    • DIY KARMA KIT@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      wow, first time i see gif as profile pic :D yeah i disabled like 2 days ago votes and now i have actually no idea what comment on this post can have down or up votes and truly it feels nice, I recommend it to everybody

  • LumpyPancakes@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    I prefer to see both numbers rather than the sum. The variance sort of gives a ‘controversial’ score. Can’t get that with PieFed yet, but I prefer the deduplication of PieFed over the split scores on Voyager.

      • LumpyPancakes@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        It’s much the same. Lemmy and PieFed talk to each other no worries.

        It does all the same things but has some additional features as well. The killer feature for me is merging duplicate posts so you only see them once but with all the comments from the different groups stacked underneath.

  • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    Yes, sometimes I say some stupid shit and other people correct me. Sometimes it’s the reverse. We all keep each other accountable.

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      I also like that, but I’m not as fond of when the correction is immediately aggressive, dismissive or insulting.

      Like when people start ascribing attributes to my personality without knowing me or make assumptions about why I said it. I’d rather have people asking me to elaborate than jumping to conclusions.

      • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Yes. I’ve learned that (it helps when I) resond with “I” statements, for that kind of interaction.

        “I don’t see it that way.” works as well as “You are wrong.”, but the “I” version implies fewer assumptions about what the other person is trying to communicate.

        Edit: I have had good luck with adjusting my approach, this way. (To add a quick I statement, haha.)

  • oo1@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    Down votes are useful for estimating the exactly how badly damaged the sense of humour in the community is.

  • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    I pay almost no attention to the scores on other people’s posts, but admittedly, I do sometimes feel disheartened when I see what I consider an extremist view getting heavily upvoted. As for downvotes, I have those hidden, so in that sense, they’re a non-factor for me. But you’re asking whether I care. Of course I care and anyone claiming otherwise is lying. We’re social animals - we care what others think of us. That’s why I hid the downvotes in the first place: so they wouldn’t affect me. Mean comments are enough to deal with; I don’t need to hear the audience booing too.

    My perhaps unpopular opinion is that while the voting system itself should remain, the scores should be hidden for everyone - and I mean both upvotes and downvotes. Downvotes don’t mean you’re wrong, and upvotes don’t mean you’re right. They’re just indicators of how popular your opinion is with the audience. That dynamic encourages people to self-censor unpopular views and, conversely, to post meaningless one-liners just for the applause.