• lath@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    National identity is definitely taught, but it’s also acquired naturally. We like to belong, so even if we weren’t assigned a specific nationality, i believe we’d eventually be making our own, just more freely and dynamic.

    • FundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Identity is aquired naturally. National Identity isn’t.

      In other systems our core identity might be city, or village, or lake, or mountain range, or tribe, or class, or job, or beliefs, or culture, or relgion, or clan, or langauge, or dialect etc.

      National Identity (Nationalism) is a rather new thing to be mainstream. Only a couple centuries.

      • fckreddit@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        Maybe this is too idealistic, but I strongly believe that instead of identifying with one arbitrary group or another, perhaps we should aim to identify as human or even as part of the nature itself.

      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Nationalism as an ideology is relatively new, identity and sentiment tied to a state and shared cultural grouping is very old and it’s actually quite debated when you could really say it evolved.

        For example:

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationalism_in_the_Middle_Ages

        And if you ever want to fluster a classical studies professor, ask them whether they consider Roman identity to be nationalism in front of a peer.