They call it “dark traffic” - ads that are not seen by tech-savvy users who have excellent ad blockers.

Not surprised that its growing. The web is unusable without an ad blocker and its only getting worse, and will continue to get worse every month.

        • jaybone@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          1 month ago

          Unless it’s intellectual property that belongs to the movie industry. Then you better not touch it. Or that’s illegal.

          But if it’s advertisements, then you have to watch it, or that’s illegal.

      • Taldan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Mildly pedantic, but uBlock blocks the connection before it enters your network

    • U@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      96
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah. As if hacking into someone’s mind is their right. Talk about entitlement…

    • IllNess@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      63
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      What should be considered illegal circumvention is allowing articles behind a paywall to be included in search results.

    • ramble81@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      And this is exactly why Google did away with Manifest v2 (what uBlock runs on) and why they wanted to introduce their “web integrity” standard. At that point the pages would be signed with ads and in the signature didn’t match the page wouldn’t even be shown.

      They tried to play it off as “ensuring that you truly get the correct copy of the page and no bad hackers have intercepted it” but really it would have 100% forced ads.

      • Almacca@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Then I guess I’m not looking at those pages. No skin off my nose. That said, Firefox with Ublock Origin plus a couple of other ad-blockers seems to be working pretty well for me. Anything with a paywall, I just move on.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Then I guess I’m not looking at those pages. No skin of my nose.

          That works until every website starts doing it.

          • Leon@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 month ago

            I use Mullvad’s VPN and DNS on a router level. Every device on my network is blanketed by it. Some services don’t work, but I am willing to sacrifice their profits for my integrity. Thus, to them I say 然らば fuckmothers.

      • chellomere@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 month ago

        To think that Google once had ads that I considered OK, just a bunch of text and links. How times have changed…

        • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Advertisers will always keep pushing things trying to find the limit where people will just barely tolerate it. Then when they push it too far they cry “no fair!” When people stop putting up with it.

    • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      The O.G. add blocker.

      1000029610

      The concept is close to the same, how could something like this be seen as “illegal circumvention technology”?

      It just shows us how disconnected the people in these positions can be that are regulating these things.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Fuckers want to colonize my property (my computer). that’s what’s illegal!

    • 1984@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 month ago

      They wont be happy until eye tracking technology makes sure we sit and watch their fucking ads before the actual content appears.

      I mean, none of this is getting better. Its only going to become worse. I have ads in the fucking pause screen on my streaming tv app. So if I want to take a toilet break, I get an ad in my face. Its just so ridiculous.

      • Booboofinger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        What most of these people don’t get is if they didn’t get so invasive with those ads, people would not have to resort to ad blockers. Be it tho shut up the ads every few seconds on YouTube or having to play whack-a-mole every time I read an article, eventually you run out of patience and say “enough!”

    • zerofk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Say here’s a thought: can we sue ad companies for theft of electricity? They’re using my electricity to display their ads, without my consent.