• DrCake@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      4 months ago

      I swear this image has been around for ages, way before AI could generate anything this well

    • Mark with a Z@suppo.fi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I’m gonna need some evidence for that.

      It doesn’t look like AI. The bike and everything makes sense. I can even read S-WORKS on the frame.

    • kautau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      lol what an edit without telling people that you originally said it was AI slop without making that note in your comment

      • Naich@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Look at the frame. It makes no sense. The front wheel has both disk brakes and caliper brakes, but the bars have no brake levers. The front disk with different slots on one side. I could go on. On the other hand, there is a bike that looks like this, so I’m not sure any more. That front disk is definitely not right.

        • Mark with a Z@suppo.fi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Mate you’re confusing mtb suspension parts for brakes and slop. The brake handles on these are short to be used with just a couple fingers and angled downwards.

          Edit: yeah, that’s exactly the kind of bike I meant.

          • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 months ago

            As for the brake disc looking funny, it is similar to photographing a fan or helicopter blades. Unless your exposure is extremely short it warps the shape a little bit due to the speed of rotation.

        • herrvogel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          4 months ago

          Those are usual inconsistencies and errors and artifacts, and a healthy amount of incapability to explain what you don’t know. Those have existed since long before AI.

          I’ve seen this picture many many years ago, before stable diffusion was a thing.

        • Jack@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’ma gonna go with not AI on this one, even the motion blur seems to be ok, idk

    • oktoberpaard@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m not sure about that, but it does have motion blur in the background, so unless it’s a fancy setup that tracks the movement of the subject, it was not an automatically triggered shot.