I have finally got my selfhost wiki up to a satisfying shape. Its here: https://wiki.gardiol.org

Take a look i hope it can help somebody.

I am open to any suggestions about it.

Note: the most original part is the one about multi-homed routing and failbacks and advanced routing.

  • N0x0n@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Thanks for sharing, very cool stuff in there and great job ! Bookmarked !

    While reading through your reverse proxy concept post, I think this statement is wrong:

    As a sub-domain:
    - Cons: require additional certificates for HTTPS/SSL for each sub-domain
    

    There are actually wildcard SAN certificates where you can access all your subdomains with a single certificate: https://*.mydomain.com

    Or you can add all your subdomains in a single certificate.

    Great work and thanks for sharing !

    • The Hobbyist@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      You are right and I would add that this is even a privacy and security measure, to make use of wildcard certificates. The reason is, those subdomains will be public because of websites like crt.sh which show all subdomains which have their dedicated certificate. Obfuscation can be helpful in not disclosing which are some services or naming schemes you use for yourself even if it is only meant to be for internal use.

      • vegetaaaaaaa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Obfuscation can be helpful in not disclosing which are some services or naming schemes

        The “obfuscation” benefits of wildcard certificates are very limited (public DNS records can still easily be found with tools such as sublist3r), and they’re definitely a security liability (get the private key of the cert stolen from a single server -> TLS potentially compromised on all your servers using the wildcard cert)

    • TheHolm@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      using wildcards is really bad security practice. and at age of ACME absolutely unnecessary.

      • The Hobbyist@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Can you elaborate on why it is a bad security practice? It’s the first time I’m reading about it and I’d like to read more about it. Thanks!

        • Shimitar@feddit.itOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          One of the risks associated with wildcard SSL certificates is the increased attack surface they introduce. If one subdomain becomes compromised, it opens the door for potential attackers to gain unauthorized access to all subdomains secured under the wildcard certificate. (first google link)

          • cron@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            While this argument is valid for a larger domain, it doesn’t really matter for the small selfhoster.

            • Shimitar@feddit.itOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              Using let’s encrypt certbot is so easy and automated that I never bothered for wildcards anyway, so.

              • lorentz@feddit.it
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                The advantage of wildcard certificates is that you don’t have to expose each single subdomain over internet. Which is great if you want to have https on local only subdomains.

                • TheHolm@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  If you still use HTTP for cert verification on ACME, you are doing it wrong. Use DNS-01 only, there is no need to allow any inbound traffic to your servers. and HTTP will not give you wildcard anyway.

      • N0x0n@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        That’s true. But it doesn’t take away the possibility to use them in a selfhosted environnement.

        Large enteprises like facebook and google still use them, but they have the backing to secure them safely.

        Also, there is always the possibilty to add all subdomains in one certificate which takes away the wildcard subdomains.

  • CronyAkatsukiA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    I recently started something similar using bookstack as the software behind.

    Still severely lacking in content but am willing for anyone who has time and something interesting to write in it as long it’s connected to tech, preferably linuc and open source software.

    Here is the link and if anyone want’s to contribhte I’m more than willing to accept a couple editor to grow the content on it.

    https://wiki.cronyakatsuki.xyz

    • Shimitar@feddit.itOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Now the big question is: are you an Arch or a Gentoo lover? Just joking.

      Good job! Keep it up

      • CronyAkatsukiA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        At one point was arch lover, then I became a gentoo lover.

        Now I’m on nixos because gentoo didn’t have a good retroarch package.

  • schmorp@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    Thanks a lot for sharing this. I’ll keep it bookmarked for later reference, looks very cool!

  • Decronym@lemmy.decronym.xyzB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I’ve seen in this thread:

    Fewer Letters More Letters
    DNS Domain Name Service/System
    HTTP Hypertext Transfer Protocol, the Web
    HTTPS HTTP over SSL
    IP Internet Protocol
    SAN Storage Area Network
    SSL Secure Sockets Layer, for transparent encryption
    TLS Transport Layer Security, supersedes SSL
    nginx Popular HTTP server

    8 acronyms in this thread; the most compressed thread commented on today has 15 acronyms.

    [Thread #556 for this sub, first seen 29th Feb 2024, 10:35] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]

  • Fisch@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Might be worth adding a section for web UIs that make managing certain things easier. For example, Cockpit or Nginx Proxy Manager.

    • Shimitar@feddit.itOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I think NPM is useless (in my use-case…) and can get things more messy, but I plan to check on cockpit later on indeed.

      NPM isn’t bad in itself, but NGINX configuration is basically static and IMHO don’t require a dedicated GUI.

        • Shimitar@feddit.itOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yeah, i kind of wrote badly. I mean NGINX configuration is simple enough and static enough not to need a dedicated service for my use case. I don’t feel the need to mess with NPM. I have a neat folder structure under nginx config so that adding one service is pretty clean and simple and editing one too.