• stevestevesteve@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    191
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    “well baby snoop it’s called adoption” as if they’d have a problem explaining little orphan Annie or Stuart little or any number of adopted children

      • riot@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        And seeing as it’s his grandkid, he can even just say, “Ask your parents.”, if he wants to be a real coward about it.

        smh, why does it have to be everyone else’s problem that people don’t want to talk to their (grand)kids?

  • Chozo@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    145
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    So your grandson has an understanding on the biology of reproduction, but is stumped by the idea of adoption? I think the kid might be dumb, big chief.

    • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      That movie is set way in the future and the baby looks like both of the mothers. I don’t think it was an adoption, I think the assumption is that they somehow figured out a way to have 2 women have a baby together with both of their DNA in the future. I watched it with my kid n kinda thought huh, that’s a bit of an odd choice, but my kids didn’t ask, and frankly I didn’t care. The movie was shit though, and this tiny, weird bit of plot was irrelevant to it sucking. The decision to replace the voice actor for Buzz was super annoying. He just sounded wrong and the movie was fucking space groundhog day but worse.

      • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        That movie is set way in the future and the baby looks like both of the mothers.

        Sperm banks stock from a variety of ethnic backgrounds and etc to enable this; sometimes they use donor material from siblings on the non … Directy involved partner for the same reason

  • acchariya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    113
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Yes, a cartoon lesbian couple is highly inappropriate for the grandson of a drug huffing, ho banging gangster.

    • Karjalan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      63
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      While his take here is shitty, I think doing drugs and having sex with women for money is not something that warrants out right condemnation imo.

      His involvement in murder and assault, and the sexual assault and battery accusations are much more damming and legit reasons to shit on him though.

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        48
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        it’s not condemnation, it’s pointing out hypocrisy.

        • yermaw@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          27
          ·
          8 months ago

          If I had to choose between explaining how 2 women have a baby and explaining what “pimpin’ a ho” and “187 on an undercover cop” means, I know what I’d prefer.

        • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          I don’t know if hypocrisy is the right term. Maybe in an extremely broad sense but then it starts to lose its meaning.

          • lime!@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            8 months ago

            the man has financed and produced lesbian pornos. i don’t think it’s that broad.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Broadly it might not be worthy of condemnation, but in the context of “child appropriate” it would seem to be way less appropriate than what he is complaining about.

        • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          I think Snoop is being a dumbass here (like I did when he went to Trump’s inauguration party) but this is a bad argument. He didn’t make the music for young children.

  • MisterMoo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Upvoting for awareness of what a snowflake Snoop is and in the hopes we can get past the “awww he and Martha Stewart are best buds” era.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      i felt like his relationship with martha seemed too unnatural, its basically a white woman “im friends with a black guy, so im not racist” to the right winger base.

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    8 months ago

    I hate this argument. “You people can’t exist in public because I might have to talk to my stupid kids”.

  • RattlerSix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    It’s wild to me that someone who got rich selling songs to teens about fucking bitches, selling drugs and killing cops could keep a straight have (edit: face! Straight face!) while saying he’s offended about anything.

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah, what a soft ass human being. Soft constitution (lack of integrity) and soft morals make for a pathetic excuse for a human being.

  • x4740N@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    Is there a credible source of evidence that “Snoop Dogg” actually said this?

    If he actually said this then he’s a horrible fucking human being but I don’t like accusing someone of doing something horrible without evidence

    I’ve already seen it happen to people online and false accusations can ruin lives and it can be hard to repair that life after its been ruined

    I’ve never heard of this claim apart from this image

    EDIT:

    Looked at a few comments with links to articles and have only skimmed through 2 so far but yeah he’s a piece of fucking shit

  • Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    My son just started third grade. It is actually super easy to answer questions like this if you’re a kind person who allows others to keep their humanity if they are different, and if you actually cultivate a relationship with your child.

    Explaining how two women parent a child? Wow, that must be tough my snoop guy. Better to just hide from the public like a little bitch, as you might say.

    I mean, I’ve had to address things like the topic of death because of a grandparent dying young and a future sibling ending in a miscarriage. And the original due date recently passed too. oof.

    But thank fucking god that in my family’s weakened state, none of us were assaulted by the vile image of two women holding hands and kissing a baby on the head at the same time.

    Check this out though Dogg: if you were sent back 50 years in time with white skin and no memory, within a week you’d be fighting to bring back segregation. Cunt.

  • lobut@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Right because lesbians should only exist in pornos (like the GGW ones Snoop promoted at one point). Definitely not in real life, right Snoop?

    Fucks sake, we can’t depict two people in love because you can’t explain it to your grandson? Should we not depict space travel or is he a rocket scientist that we don’t know about?