• Jrockwar@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    3 days ago

    I would recommend people buy their books off ZLibrary instead, where they come with no DRM.

    • kadu@scribe.disroot.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Whaaat? There’s Android for jailbroken Kindles? Back in my day the only thing you could do with a jailbreak was installing a slow version of KOReader that didn’t really work very well.

      • Comrade_Squid@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Welcome to the future but honestly, android is liable to break, I’ve been rocking this for a year and had to a factory reset already. Luckily, out of the box it has all I need.

    • BitsAndBites@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      I bought my first ereader this summer and got a Kindle and hated it. Returned it and got a Kobo. Its fantastic, I can just load my ebooks like it’s an external drive. I dont have to email all my ebooks to Amazon just to get them on my own device.

      • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I’ll be switching to kobo next time round, but I’ve never not been able to dump books onto my kindle by usb. I do it with my phone over USB sometimes. Since when has not doing that been a thing?

    • sunbytes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’ve been with them for a couple of years now. Unfortunately the devices just doubled in price but I’m very happy with them otherwise.

    • LaggyKar@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      The problem is some authors signing exclusivity deal with Amazon, which means breaking the DRM and converting it is the only way to read it on a different e-reader.

    • dantheclamman@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yep, I had a Kindle library of a few dozen books, when they started their shenanigans locking down the desktop client earlier this year I downloaded all of them, de-drmed and converted to epub with Calibre. Hosting them on Calibre-web and accessing with KOreader on a Kobo. I continue to buy books on Kobo and Google Books, which let me download copies (albeit with DRM).

      Makes me wonder after all these years why Amazon is locking down ability to move books around. I wonder if they’re starting to feel some real competition and feel threatened! The market of cheap e-ink Android ereaders seems to be growing more and more

  • ToxicWaste@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 days ago

    again displaying, that DRM only hurts legitimate users. a pirate has never had the problem of backing up, moving or sharing his library…

    • dantheclamman@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      4 days ago

      It is remarkable how many books available for free on Gutenberg are sold in the same format on Amazon (it’d be one thing if they were special editions, new translations etc, but they’re the same!)

      • nyan@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        4 days ago

        People out to make a quick buck are banking on suckers not knowing about Project Gutenberg, or failing to check it, or not wanting to do a couple of extra steps to get something onto their Kindle.

    • Paradox@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      4 days ago

      Check out standard ebooks. They take public domain books and “clean” them up with really good typesetting, spelling fixes, and other things. All free too

      • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        Standard is fantastic! The books are better quality than what they charge for on “marketplaces” and can be read for free or downloaded wholesale for a song. Add to that they host an opds catologue that fbreader can browse and you have incredibly convenient public domain books right to the ereader.

      • artyom@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Every time I go to checkout a book on Libby it’s like 6-10 weeks’ wait. If I put a hold on it then I’m just not in a place to read/listen at that time and then I feel bad for hogging it instead.

        Better to just pirate or buy from a non-DRM distributor.

  • Corridor8031@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    3 days ago

    It annoys me so much that they have convinced anyone that this stuff is for protecting against piracy of something like that, while this is just another tool for them to force you into using their platform and ecosystem. It does nothing against piracy.

    • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Yeah you can easily pirate any book, or even just get them free at the library. This just fucks over the authors and people who want to buy their books legally. People don’t buy books because they have to, they want to.

      • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yep, I could pirate all my books and audio books if I wanted. All it would do is fuck over the author tho.

        As much as I hate audible it’s the only legal choice I have for many of the books I listen to. Since basically every other legal option has out of the nearly 500 or so audio books I have less then 50 of them.

        It’s annoying.

    • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      Books were among the first things to be pirated and are still among the easiest because the amount of data is so small. People we’re doing that on dial up Internet.

    • fodor@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      And to repurchase. Never forget that aspect of the scam. Sell but don’t actually sell, make the customer keep on paying.

  • Beej Jorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    ·
    4 days ago

    I will never, ever purchase a book I can’t remove the DRM from.

    And there are people out there who are absolutely fanatical about book preservation. They will photograph every single page and run it through OCR and recreate an ebook just so it gets preserved. DRM is absolutely pointless and stupid.

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      3 days ago

      Exactly this. As an idiot I purchase DRM music when Microsoft had its own music store. Some years later they closed it and there was no way to validate music keys.

      But thankfully I still have an old Roxio9( I think) CD, and back then Roxio didn’t know what DRM was and would take the mp3 and burn it to DVD anyway, bypassing the key check, then I would just rip it back off the DVD…DRM is useless

      • tiramichu@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        For real.

        When I still had Netflix and Disney+ I’d want to watch a show on my PC, but I’d just get black screen with only audio, because something about my setup the DRM didn’t like. (Possibly that I have USB displaylink monitors.)

        So I had to watch on another device.

        DRM isn’t stopping content being ripped. It’s just making life a pain for paying customers.

        • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          3 days ago

          Offering a clean, ad free, usable storefront to purchase media would do more to prevent piracy than anything.

          But corpos dont like that.

          • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            This is the entire foundational point Gabe made with steam.

            Hell I still get a chuckle when people bitch able steam “drm”. Since it’s entirely optional and can literally be turned off by just adding a text file with the steam ID in basically every case. If it’s even there to begin with

            99% of the time the “drm” people bitch about is just the steam overlay dll crashing if steam is off. Cause you know trying to load something that’s off doesn’t really work.

            You can literally just remove a single dll from like 95% of steam games and you have an entirely “drm” free game.

            Silksong is a great example with how popular it’s been Iv seen thousands of people bitching moaning and crying about how it has drm on steam when it for a fact doesn’t. It just has the single dll so it can use the overlay. Just deleting the dll so it doesn’t load up the overlay and ta-da its fucking drm free.

          • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 days ago

            That could’ve been iTunes if their interface didn’t suck ass and if they didn’t go for the subscription-only model in Apple Music.

            I swear for years it was THE place to buy music. I mean I never did, I didn’t have access to a card with online payments enabled as a teen, so I just pirated everything anyway. But it seemed like the default place.

          • namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            Of course. It’s all about control. They see users as property, an object to be sold and traded.

            Do not ever allow yourselves to be disrespected like this.

            • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              Try explaining any of this to my friends lol. Obsessed with Google, the tok, xitter, and shitty data stealing llms. Disgusting garbage.

        • Beej Jorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          I couldn’t get Netflix to play at high resolution on my old Roku because of some DRM crap. And I was a legit customer! Once again, piracy would have provided a superior experience.

  • ඞmir@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    What does this mean? What prevents me from OCRing the pages on a video that quickly goes through it?

    • dantheclamman@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      You are making a common mistake of being too literal with headlines! What you described is quite difficult and laborious. Nothing prevents you from doing that. Please try in the future to read headlines knowing the editor has written them to attract your attention, using a provocative word like “impossible”, while the piece itself might still provide useful information. This is an important aspect of media literacy.

      • ඞmir@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Well yeah, but fearmongering about text DRM is just annoying to see. There are many battles to fight, and epub extraction from a Kindle is very low on the priority list

  • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    This entire thing has been made needlessly complicated. Easy fix though.

    1. Get whatever ebook you want.
    2. Borrow some code from GitHub and teach a raspberry pi with a camera and a few servos to snap pictures of pages, turn the pages, snap again into a PDF.
    3. A script then parses all the images and OCRs them for the final PDF.
    4. You now own a backup of your DRM book, which you own forever. Pretty sure this is actually legal under DMCA since you are taking a backup of something you allegedly own. The encryption circumvention is irrelevant.
    5. now, break the law and throw the PDF on the internet to everyone. Go little bot! Go go go!
    • ysjet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      The encryption circumvention is irrelevant.

      Oh you sweet summer child, judges will bend over backwards to slap people with multi-decade-to-life charges for ‘hacking,’ even if the ‘hacking’ is just the rightsholder accidentally presenting data to you.

      • tomkatt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 days ago

        To be fair, if you OCR the pages via camera, you haven’t actually circumvented DRM. That means it’s a completely legal backup, as the DRM on the original file was untouched and unaltered. This definitely does fall under fair use.

        • ysjet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          3 days ago

          Theoretically, yes. Realistically, judges historically believe anything prosecutors tell them about hacking and circumvention.

          There’s been people thrown in jail for the rest of their life for the crime of clicking a public URL that the company didn’t intend to be public.

          • 0x0@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            There’s been people thrown in jail for the rest of their life for the crime of clicking a public URL that the company didn’t intend to be public.

            Source?
            The closest i’ve heard was a journalist being accused of hacking for the crime of choosing “view source” in the right-click menu of a web-browser.

            • ysjet@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              If you scroll down a bit, I actually already answered that question in this exact threat, one reply down.

            • ysjet@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              Looks like I mixed up two different cases- the cause of one, and the duration of another.

              weev (who apparently is a giant asshole) was the one who got sent to jail for accessing a completely public URL AT&T wished he didn’t in 2010. The EFF took up his case. His sentence was later vacated by another court because so many civil rights lawyers kept joining his team pro-bono so the court tossed it out on a blatant technicality to get the issue to go away, so he only served ~2y.

              As for the CFAA being used to slap people with life sentences, there’s too many examples to know which one I was mixing it up with. Aaron Swartz is the classic example.

              • 0x0@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                3 days ago

                so he only served ~2y.

                Still 2y more than he should’ve, geez…

        • dermanus@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          You didn’t circumvent it by breaking the encryption, but I’d say you still circumvented it.

      • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        They already ruled on this in favor of allowing you to back up what you already own. See video games, DVDs and CDs, video tapes, this is well established already.

        • ysjet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          They actually walked that back using blu-rays as an excuse. If there’s any sort of DRM/encryption/etc, you’re completely unallowed to circumvent it, even for personal backup.