• naticus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    While I get that yes it’s often a money grab, especially when it’s a remaster of a game that’s less than 10 years old (sometimes less than 5 years), there are times where it’s completely valid and justifiable.

    Let’s just look at the very recent Trails in the Sky 1st Chapter release. Yeah we could probably just call this a remake, but in this case it’s such a faithful recreation of the original, it’s like playing that original all over again. But this fixes the accessibility issue this first trilogy has in that the only way to play it in English is either: PSP, Vita, or 2014 PC release. No modern console can play it, and it’s a very important story arc. Now us rabid Trails fans can pretty unanimously say where the best starting point of the series is.

  • Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    I am in my 50s and I’ve missed a couple of decades of games - stopped gaming in the days of vice city and just started again recently when I got a steam deck. There’s a pretty big backlog of stuff that people highly recommend, but remasters and remakes offer me the opportunity to play these games with modern graphics. For someone who grew up with 8 bit graphics the stuff we can do these days is amazing and I want to enjoy games that are also good to look at. Recently finished bioshock remaster, enjoyed it immensely. So yeah, while it’s probably better for studios to focus on creating new stuff, there are people who enjoy the old stuff updated.

  • itztalal@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    I just stopped caring.

    Was funny watching everyone buy the Oblivion remaster and put it down 3 days later as I predicted.

  • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    The video starts by showing a side by side of original Arkham Asylum and Return to Arkham Asylum, talking about how the remaster ruined the art style. At first, they’re unlabeled, and I thought, “Oh yeah, that sucks, that is a bit worse.” Then they labeled them, and the one I thought looked better was the remaster. What’s more is I’ve only ever played the original PC release of Arkham Asylum, one of my favorite games, and the remaster looks the way I remember Arkham Asylum looking.

    • Lumisal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      and the remaster looks the way I remember Arkham Asylum looking.

      That’s what happened to me with Metroid Prime

  • yermaw@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Didn’t watch the video, because cba, but remasters have their place if theyre warranted. PS1/N64 era games for instance. Maybe PS2/Xbox.

    360/PS3 onwards do not need it.

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      cba

      Consumer Bankers of America??

      California Board of Accountancy?

      Continental Basketball Association?

      Collective Bargaining Agreement?

      Chicago Bagel Authority?

    • Peffse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I recently played Final Fantasy XIII on Xbox Series X. I was amazed at how great it looked when output at modern 4K with 60fps and 16x anisotropic filtering. The gameplay was still crap, but amazing to look at given it was on 360 originally.

      Because of that experience, I am a little more forgiving for 360/PS3 generation. Those games were mostly running 720p frame buffers (or worse) and seriously gain a lot when given some shine.

      (This completely ignores the fact that PC would naturally have these abilities without an additional purchase)