• halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    10 days ago

    That’s because they make an insane amount of money by taking 30% of every sale on their platform, which nearly everyone uses because they’re a near monopoly and the alternatives are terrible. Around $3.5 Million per employee, nearly 5x the next highest company, which is Facebook at around $780,000 per employee.

    https://www.pcgamer.com/gaming-industry/valves-reported-profit-per-head-from-steam-commissions-is-out-there-and-at-usd3-5-million-per-employee-it-makes-apple-and-facebook-look-like-a-lemonade-stand/

    • ysjet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      76
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      I should note that 30% is incredibly standard in the industry, and Valve offers a LOT more for that 30% than literally any other digital publisher. Physical publishers take substantially more, and the only digital store that offers less is EGS, which is simultaneously absolute dogshite and also has been trying very, very hard to astroturd the ‘30%’ thing for ages.

      Nintendo, Sony, and Apple all take 30%. I think MS does as well, but don’t quote me on that one.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      It’s fucking wild. Like, I love Steam, don’t get me wrong, but holy shit just suck less (edit: than other stores do) and charge less (edit: of devs) and you could gobble up a lot of that market share. But none of them do.

    • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      Around $3.5 Million per employee, nearly 5x the next highest company, which is Facebook at around $780,000 per employee.

      that’s a bullshit metric only useful to incite hatred. why the fuck do you want to say that valve is “this many times worse than facebook!”? it is obviously false.

      only thing this proves is that they have relatively few employees. which also probably means that most of them do real work instead of being overloaded with managers

      • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 days ago

        The numbers just show that they are 8x as efficient. I only referenced Facebook because they’re the next closest company for comparison.

        I never said they were worse than Facebook. That’s your assumption, reading what you want, not what’s actually being said.

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 days ago

      You‘re getting downvotes for no reason. Also anyone who ever had to contact Steam support felt how criminally understaffed they are so it makes sense they make tons of money per employee I guess.

    • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      As if normal for companies to say you know what we are getting enough profits lets not monetize things even more.