• squaresinger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 months ago

    If you look at the commercially successful variants of Linux (ChromeOS and Android), you’ll see that taking away freedom/choice was the first thing they did.

    And ultimately, if you are targeting the mass market, that’s almost required.

      • squaresinger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Successful compared to what? I don’t have data, but I’d venture to say that it’s the most popular desktop Linux distro.

        It’s a bit past its peak, but in 2023 it had 7% market share in the quite lucrative North American market. That’s not nothing. In North America, all other Linux distros combined just overtook ChromeOS this year. World-wide it was last year.

        There’s also no other Linux distro that comes pre-installed on devices from different manufacturers (at least none that I know of).

        • squaresinger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Well, all Linux distros combined are more than ChromeOS. If you split up by distro, ChromeOS is still the top Linux distro by far.

    • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Standardization is a requirement. Whether that still gives the user the ability to color outside of the lines on what’s considered “standard” will be the key factor.