The GNOME.org Extensions hosting for GNOME Shell extensions will no longer accept new contributions with AI-generated code. A new rule has been added to their review guidelines to forbid AI-generated code.

Due to the growing number of GNOME Shell extensions looking to appear on extensions.gnome.org that were generated using AI, it’s now prohibited. The new rule in their guidelines note that AI-generated code will be explicitly rejected

  • uncouple9831@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    13 days ago

    Exactly, there isn’t a criteria other than the reviewer getting butthurt. Granted this is gnome, so doing whatever they feel like regardless of consequences is kind of their thing, but a saner organization would try to make the actual measurable badness more clear.

    • logging_strict@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      A saner organization would also hit up submitters for a reviewer’s fee. This would reduce AI spam. Barriers to entry matter.

      A reviewers fee is equivalent to Canonical offering customer support contracts. Obviously a person that needs to lean on AI as a crutch, is just screaming out for reviewers to act as advisers. The reviewer just wielding the giant DENIED stamp is fun, but doesn’t address the issue of noobs implicitly asking to work with a consultant.

      gnome reviewers obviously never missing an opportunity to miss an opportunity.